git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
	Sebastian Thiel <byronimo@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] Documentation/git-pull.txt: mention --quiet and  --verbose for fetching
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:31:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <be6fef0d1002182231t56d04b89h8910dce5cbed3f@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vhbpe5jvo.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

Hi,

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 5:11 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> It may make more sense to list the options that affects both fetch and
> merge at the beginning of the OPTIONS section before the merge/fetch
> subsections.  IOW, instead of removing ifndef::git-pull[] like your patch
> did, it would add ifndef::git-pull[] in the list of options on the merge
> side, and add pull specific description (e.g. "this is passed to both
> underlying fetch to squelch progress output of transfer, and underlying
> merge to squelch the output during the merging") in git-pull.txt.

I considered adding a "common options" section too, but wasn't sure.
I'll take your suggestion on this.

-- 
Cheers,
Ray Chuan

  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-19  6:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-18 12:37 [PATCH 00/10] teach --progress to transport-related builtins Tay Ray Chuan
2010-02-18 12:37 ` [PATCH 01/10] Documentation/git-pull.txt: mention --quiet and --verbose for fetching Tay Ray Chuan
2010-02-18 21:11   ` Junio C Hamano
2010-02-19  6:31     ` Tay Ray Chuan [this message]
2010-02-18 12:37 ` [PATCH 02/10] Documentation/git-push.txt: put --quiet before --verbose Tay Ray Chuan
2010-02-18 12:37 ` [PATCH 03/10] fetch: refactor verbosity option handling into transport.[ch] Tay Ray Chuan
2010-02-18 12:37 ` [PATCH 04/10] push: support multiple levels of verbosity Tay Ray Chuan
2010-02-18 12:37 ` [PATCH 05/10] clone: " Tay Ray Chuan
2010-02-18 12:37 ` [PATCH 06/10] transport->progress: use flag authoritatively Tay Ray Chuan
2010-02-18 12:37 ` [PATCH 07/10] push: learn --progress Tay Ray Chuan
2010-02-18 12:37 ` [PATCH 08/10] fetch: " Tay Ray Chuan
2010-02-18 12:37 ` [PATCH 09/10] pull: " Tay Ray Chuan
2010-02-18 12:37 ` [PATCH 10/10] transport: update flags to be in running order Tay Ray Chuan
2010-02-19  1:26 ` [PATCH 00/10] teach --progress to transport-related builtins Junio C Hamano
2010-02-19  6:31   ` Tay Ray Chuan
2010-02-19  7:53     ` Jeff King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=be6fef0d1002182231t56d04b89h8910dce5cbed3f@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=rctay89@gmail.com \
    --cc=byronimo@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).