git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>
Cc: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [1.8.0] reorganize the mess that the source tree has become
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 17:09:00 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <buo39o535gj.fsf@dhlpc061.dev.necel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1102030036420.12104@xanadu.home> (Nicolas Pitre's message of "Thu, 03 Feb 2011 01:16:10 -0500 (EST)")

Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net> writes:
>> But just moving the whole existing pile into a subdirectory "because
>> everyone else does it" is not a reason; that's superstition.
>
> There is no superstition here, simply basic elegance.

"basic elegance" is hardly well-defined, and although there are probably
issues on which there's general agreement, this doesn't appear to be one
of them.

>> Having to type "src/" a lot more often is definitely a downside.
>
> Come on.  This is a rather egocentric argument without much substance.

It certainly has more substance than hand-waving like "basic elegance"
though...

Some slightly more concrete arguments have been:

  Pro-src:  Big top-level dir scares newbs
  Anti-src: Extra typing is annoying

I'm not really against a "src/" subdir, but it seems mostly a matter of
taste, and I've seen plenty of projects where the src/ directory seemed
pretty pointless...

-Miles

-- 
Politics, n. A strife of interests masquerading as a contest of
principles. The conduct of public affairs for private advantage.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-03  8:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-02  2:29 [1.8.0] reorganize the mess that the source tree has become George Spelvin
2011-02-02  8:31 ` Erik Faye-Lund
2011-02-02 20:01   ` Pascal Obry
2011-02-03  6:16 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-03  8:09   ` Miles Bader [this message]
2011-02-03 18:01   ` Andreas Schwab
2011-02-03 18:46   ` Eugene Sajine
2011-02-03 21:42     ` Hilco Wijbenga
2011-02-04  2:06       ` Miles Bader
2011-02-04  8:30         ` Tor Arntsen
2011-02-04 10:49           ` Jakub Narebski
2011-02-04 11:17         ` Erik Faye-Lund
2011-02-04 18:15         ` [1.8.0] " Nicolas Sebrecht
2011-02-04 22:47           ` Drew Northup
2011-02-05 15:11             ` Nicolas Sebrecht
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-01-31  5:53 What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2011, #06; Sun, 30) Junio C Hamano
2011-01-31 17:05 ` Planning for 1.7.5 and 1.8.0 Junio C Hamano
2011-01-31 20:28   ` [1.8.0] reorganize the mess that the source tree has become Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-31 20:57     ` Junio C Hamano
2011-01-31 21:08       ` Matthieu Moy
2011-01-31 21:33         ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-31 21:19       ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-31 21:00     ` Jeff King
2011-01-31 21:28       ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-31 22:17         ` Junio C Hamano
2011-01-31 22:36           ` João P. Sampaio
2011-01-31 22:37           ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-31 23:12         ` Jeff King
2011-02-01  0:29           ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-01  1:48             ` Jeff King
2011-02-01  4:05               ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-01 12:42                 ` Thomas Rast
2011-02-01 11:14                   ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-02-01 11:22                     ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-02-01 13:08                   ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-01 16:02                   ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-02-01 21:53               ` Junio C Hamano
2011-02-01  0:35           ` Erik Faye-Lund
2011-02-01  1:53             ` Jeff King
2011-02-01  1:00           ` Sverre Rabbelier
2011-02-01  1:57             ` Jeff King
2011-02-01  7:24           ` Jay Soffian
2011-02-01 14:42         ` Andreas Ericsson
2011-02-05  3:21     ` Martin von Zweigbergk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=buo39o535gj.fsf@dhlpc061.dev.necel.com \
    --to=miles@gnu.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@horizon.com \
    --cc=nico@fluxnic.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).