From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Miles Bader Subject: Re: [RFC] deprecating and eventually removing "git relink"? Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:48:00 +0900 Message-ID: References: <7v4ny7mtbx.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20111114103451.GA10847@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7vfwhqjw4u.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20111114202522.GA26269@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7vmxbyicgg.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Jeff King , Simon Brenner , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Nov 15 05:48:12 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RQAwN-0006Dz-Re for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 05:48:12 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751856Ab1KOEsG (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Nov 2011 23:48:06 -0500 Received: from relmlor4.renesas.com ([210.160.252.174]:46429 "EHLO relmlor4.renesas.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751231Ab1KOEsF (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Nov 2011 23:48:05 -0500 Received: from relmlir3.idc.renesas.com ([10.200.68.153]) by relmlor4.idc.renesas.com ( SJSMS) with ESMTP id <0LUO00LNAQO3VS00@relmlor4.idc.renesas.com> for git@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:48:03 +0900 (JST) Received: from relmlac3.idc.renesas.com ([10.200.69.23]) by relmlir3.idc.renesas.com ( SJSMS) with ESMTP id <0LUO003DGQO3R990@relmlir3.idc.renesas.com> for git@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:48:03 +0900 (JST) Received: by relmlac3.idc.renesas.com (Postfix, from userid 0) id 3E58D18071; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:48:03 +0900 (JST) Received: from relmlac3.idc.renesas.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relmlac3.idc.renesas.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F2EA18077; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:48:03 +0900 (JST) Received: from relmlii1.idc.renesas.com [10.200.68.65] by relmlac3.idc.renesas.com with ESMTP id PAA27318; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:48:03 +0900 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,513,1315148400"; d="scan'208";a="54784828" Received: from unknown (HELO relay41.aps.necel.com) ([10.29.19.9]) by relmlii1.idc.renesas.com with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:48:02 +0900 Received: from dhlpc061 (dhlpc061.dev.necel.com [10.114.96.50]) by relay41.aps.necel.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAF4m169021457; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:48:01 +0900 (JST) Received: by dhlpc061 (Postfix, from userid 31295) id EB0AA52E283; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:48:00 +0900 (JST) System-Type: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-reply-to: <7vmxbyicgg.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano writes: > I did not mean "it is wrong because it does not match what Miles said" > by that. In fact, I think it is a better approach to put things in > clients first and consolidating possible duplicates at the central one > purely as optimization, and I do not necessarily see "write to central > from the beginning" as a particularly good "optimization". FWIW, this seems reasonable to me... -Miles -- Circus, n. A place where horses, ponies and elephants are permitted to see men, women and children acting the fool.