From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Miles Bader Subject: Re: cmake, was Re: submodules' shortcomings Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 13:25:18 +0900 Message-ID: References: <4B3F6742.6060402@web.de> <4B421F90.4090402@web.de> <3af572ac1001051238t63e07a25hf9dd77056b79be89@mail.gmail.com> <3af572ac1001051717u7757f0dep9392fbb7b02cbbca@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: Miles Bader Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Johannes Schindelin , Git Mailing List To: Pau Garcia i Quiles X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jan 06 05:25:32 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NSNSe-00006L-3Q for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 05:25:32 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755068Ab0AFEZ2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jan 2010 23:25:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754774Ab0AFEZ2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jan 2010 23:25:28 -0500 Received: from TYO202.gate.nec.co.jp ([202.32.8.206]:47416 "EHLO tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754736Ab0AFEZ1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jan 2010 23:25:27 -0500 Received: from relay11.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.46]) by tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o064PEBV009339; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 13:25:18 +0900 (JST) Received: from relay11.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.16] [10.29.19.16]) by relay11.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 13:25:18 +0900 Received: from dhlpc061 ([10.114.114.32] [10.114.114.32]) by relay11.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 13:25:18 +0900 Received: by dhlpc061 (Postfix, from userid 31295) id 7C57F52E1EF; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 13:25:18 +0900 (JST) System-Type: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: <3af572ac1001051717u7757f0dep9392fbb7b02cbbca@mail.gmail.com> (Pau Garcia i. Quiles's message of "Wed, 6 Jan 2010 02:17:45 +0100") Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Pau Garcia i Quiles writes: > At this moment, what stops me from beginning this project is a simple > question: is it worth my time? From the discussion a few months ago, > it looked like it would the a second-class citizen and never replace > the existing buildsystems, so I really wonder if I should spend me > time porting git to CMake, or I should focus on other projects which > would gladly receive my contributions. If you honestly think it's > worth it, just tell me and I'll start the port to CMake immediately. It sounds like it's you who want it, so aren't you the best person to make that judgement...? It seems very unlikely for cmake to replace anything. -Miles -- Politeness, n. The most acceptable hypocrisy.