From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Miles Bader Subject: Re: Usability of git stash Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:23:44 +0900 Message-ID: References: <87wsg9acfv.fsf@cup.kalibalik.dk> <86vdvsg4up.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <87prly5k5r.fsf@cup.kalibalik.dk> Reply-To: Miles Bader Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Brandon Casey , David Kastrup , git@vger.kernel.org To: Anders Melchiorsen X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Oct 20 14:42:54 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KrnGd-00079P-8a for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 07:25:23 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752092AbYJTFYL (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Oct 2008 01:24:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752086AbYJTFYL (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Oct 2008 01:24:11 -0400 Received: from TYO201.gate.nec.co.jp ([202.32.8.193]:51232 "EHLO tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752036AbYJTFYK (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Oct 2008 01:24:10 -0400 Received: from relay21.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.50]) by tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id m9K5Nq5f007154; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:23:52 +0900 (JST) Received: from relay21.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.24] [10.29.19.24]) by relay21.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:23:52 +0900 Received: from dhapc248.dev.necel.com ([10.114.112.215] [10.114.112.215]) by relay21.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:23:52 +0900 Received: by dhapc248.dev.necel.com (Postfix, from userid 31295) id 506714C4; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:23:49 +0900 (JST) System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: <87prly5k5r.fsf@cup.kalibalik.dk> (Anders Melchiorsen's message of "Sat, 18 Oct 2008 11:26:08 +0200") Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Anders Melchiorsen writes: > I wonder whether experienced users even use stash a lot. Personally, > after getting my head around the DAG, and thus getting more > comfortable with git reset, I tend to make "WIP" commits instead. I certainly do, and my impression is that some of the biggest boosters of stash have always been the git heavy hitters (it's certainly not one of these "implemented due to nagging by newbies" features)... -Miles -- Liberty, n. One of imagination's most precious possessions.