From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Miles Bader Subject: Re: Chicken/egg problem building from a 'git clone' Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:35:50 +0900 Message-ID: References: <7vfxis86tp.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vprhw6l1i.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vd4dv7tb3.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Reply-To: Miles Bader Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: gyles19@visi.com, Johannes Schindelin , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Feb 06 11:37:34 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LVO5T-0001KW-ME for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2009 11:37:32 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753161AbZBFKgG (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Feb 2009 05:36:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753363AbZBFKgF (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Feb 2009 05:36:05 -0500 Received: from TYO201.gate.nec.co.jp ([202.32.8.193]:46216 "EHLO tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752372AbZBFKgD (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Feb 2009 05:36:03 -0500 Received: from relay21.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.50]) by tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id n16AZik8011606; Fri, 6 Feb 2009 19:35:50 +0900 (JST) Received: from relay31.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.16] [10.29.19.16]) by relay21.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Fri, 6 Feb 2009 19:35:50 +0900 Received: from dhlpc061 ([10.114.112.240] [10.114.112.240]) by relay31.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Fri, 6 Feb 2009 19:35:50 +0900 Received: by dhlpc061 (Postfix, from userid 31295) id 3863D52E27C; Fri, 6 Feb 2009 19:35:50 +0900 (JST) System-Type: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: <7vd4dv7tb3.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Fri, 06 Feb 2009 02:28:48 -0800") Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano writes: >> Er ... I was not doing so. I was saying that if one is going to use >> autoconf with git, one should use a non-ancient version. > > That is nice but the statement is only half-truth, and should be followed > by ", but why bother? You do not even need to use configure to build > git, and insn is all here...". You've got to be kidding... -Miles -- Freebooter, n. A conqueror in a small way of business, whose annexations lack of the sanctifying merit of magnitude.