From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tim Visher Subject: Re: Best CI Server for Git? Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:23:13 -0500 Message-ID: References: <1c5969370902021642v4e8d93djd22d5caa4aa9d1a9@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Matt Graham X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Feb 04 20:24:50 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LUnMa-0006Ps-VX for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 20:24:45 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757232AbZBDTXQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:23:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751849AbZBDTXP (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:23:15 -0500 Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.44.30]:19392 "EHLO yx-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755942AbZBDTXP (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:23:15 -0500 Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 8so1000438yxm.1 for ; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 11:23:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=eKqvhJxiLh8k/Sbl7Ysf2tHTFscPolebuxKI+0tFewA=; b=gV5yi+7u7UA45HtSuBVNoDtOyaEe3R6OfzDELKcNVIE/Sv+wi51fC422QWjMy6ESpr t1zPACtJALB+XtIb5RJ2xX7vrHcau85Uqel07T3QEdoGtnhfJTYl/S37evGZSEnVCRRm W8I97dTyP6/8NMHo77Q6VSH623Go7v2tHZH5E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=O8k+8HBxcNqLHBkiEdSYJGa3FgDAKyRYnmkpCju15CS8Q/2gZBLqzusRm+oYuzFR5c WLD/fzZ5yC4GEdJmglg0wyqYwDfVFr31PS3Ls6XOVKuo0JuFXaBZD0BL+dMn2Oi8qDqb 8Z4bE8g3FXcyRN4WMfe6KbgsaqH3bGa8UITWI= Received: by 10.100.139.20 with SMTP id m20mr412595and.147.1233775393551; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 11:23:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1c5969370902021642v4e8d93djd22d5caa4aa9d1a9@mail.gmail.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Matt Graham wrote: > Hudson leaves a fair amount to be implemented by plug-ins, so not > being installed out of the box doesn't really imply bad. I would say > that there are more significant differences between Hudson and Cruise > Control than how they integrate with Git. Makes sense. > We are currently switching from Cruise Control to Hudson for reasons > related to ease of use. Would you mind being a little more specific? The basics of what I've heard is that Cruise Control is ultimately much more flexible and capable, but that Hudson beats it hands down regarding usability and UI. What specific issues had your team come up against? > Here is another hudson/git plugin. It may not be quite as official > but addresses issues people have had with the more official one: > http://github.com/stephenh/hudson-git2 I remember when this was announced. Unfortunately, I can't find a clear comparison of the two. I heard in a recent thread on here that at least some of the problems being answered by hudson-git2 have been cleaned up in the latest version of the official plug-in. Is it still the case that there are problems in the official one that are fixed in Stephen's? Thanks so much for your help! :) -- In Christ, Timmy V. http://burningones.com/ http://five.sentenc.es/ - Spend less time on e-mail