From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tim Visher Subject: Re: Pair Programming Workflow Suggestions Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 11:37:34 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20090916141730.GA24893@vidovic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Sean Estabrooks , Git Mailing List To: Nicolas Sebrecht X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Sep 20 17:38:22 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MpOUX-00022h-2Z for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 17:38:21 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754129AbZITPhv convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Sep 2009 11:37:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754121AbZITPhv (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Sep 2009 11:37:51 -0400 Received: from mail-yx0-f199.google.com ([209.85.210.199]:50371 "EHLO mail-yx0-f199.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753901AbZITPhu convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Sep 2009 11:37:50 -0400 Received: by yxe37 with SMTP id 37so2356598yxe.33 for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 08:37:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+H55MQc+fPPAVmkGWQRRUjbIL5Y1K3lUJYrGL6GV3qk=; b=vzGyi1Qmk+AiYGKHuvGum94a0MNQoKzYX4az3xttjllN0iBYZCUeeCiAXs2iXuSB2X vw60hXD83SSCSU0mMuKExybKvbseIcAVE0/Tq46Ht6m0ZtpJfOBIQ0CEIuc2V1zhyJdh niNH1rRNLLToS0ErcnXF16LDFwsUMzgXhV7CM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ZUynwYfGJcwc53IhoFw4LQMkr0Hmi8VNYJc0YD6VkrOIOEciVl3eOZd8oWI8+If7Un v1TvivHPx97cAIWzmR1iRv+OAyO2dKjLMegA4avmjWtCri7yZ7c5kNj+D3A87Wngw0BK lg6E8wgPHgU04GPv1CAHQPNZpyUJyR9RyUGeA= Received: by 10.101.103.15 with SMTP id f15mr3271036anm.193.1253461074084; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 08:37:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20090916141730.GA24893@vidovic> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: > The 16/09/09, Tim Visher wrote: >> >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Pairing, on the other hand, is much more >> tightly integrated than that. =C2=A0Just like in Brian's post, it's = really >> a situation of Dev1 _&_ Dev2 wrote this feature, but one of them >> happened to be typing and doing most of the nitty-gritty developing. >> Changing the authors between committs almost seems to introduce an >> arbitrary level of distinction where it's no longer _both_ but _one >> then the other_. =C2=A0Does that make my question any clearer? > > FMPOV (and to follow the Pair Programming purpose), there isn't an "I= " > in "Pair". =C2=A0So having the same author name and sign-off for each= pair is > what makes most sense. IMHO, "dev1_and_dev2" is actually the best > option. That's certainly interesting. I guess I just assumed, not having too much practical experience with actually pairing, that the driver would be doing most of the coding for a given commit=E2=80=A6 It's true that= that's not really the case. Do you guys use Hudson or something similar when you're pairing? How's your experience regarding how it interoperates with the dev_1_and_dev_2 naming convention? --=20 In Christ, Timmy V. http://burningones.com/ http://five.sentenc.es/ - Spend less time on e-mail