From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.manjaro.org (mail.manjaro.org [116.203.91.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E3A055E7F for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 23:09:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=116.203.91.91 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708038578; cv=none; b=DAVS+Z6p3oTXgUUv1X1uopADy8Czk88mg6H9vfTWgZFt+Hxgwk1g8gSMUIsi2SbUWvRuSQm78sKKRGoYewHhZOU9Dn2JerQSHgrPN7hrGqZXSRdYBYuQ+QceDJaaTYbahO212efNeldOwwDjOZuB2Y/1Lzj4WgMGUPiiQtB2sWs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708038578; c=relaxed/simple; bh=y3qhJRxTky7YStri80W06+95y90Pkmx9rMmWDqnx5Pk=; h=MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Message-ID:Content-Type; b=MIB3n3Ogx/Y/Ebqk4K1nJt1sxDmcBDt5yDllwr/EwV4qJAHI3u3r+sNRlrcArGTdNzQF3E4dvT1XYqiE5AOffGVexuLlodaE+1qSjJjdNCy3Bt1+/fbP+da9wC4IBM+Mt70NsanmU3jfGz/RpKH943R0OFog+N+vmMlQXajisfM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=manjaro.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=manjaro.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=manjaro.org header.i=@manjaro.org header.b=lG7gfYgF; arc=none smtp.client-ip=116.203.91.91 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=manjaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=manjaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=manjaro.org header.i=@manjaro.org header.b="lG7gfYgF" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=manjaro.org; s=2021; t=1708038572; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=GuqKllgtmYSLgENHBbYCR/aUL5JlbqsrI1G3MfEzYLs=; b=lG7gfYgFb1mIZq0NS6RoKrknTG5xrnUa/E9PEkDcNcVo4j6gZdxCqx1/QFbtXSklV7GJpy KXxI8HueHmeecx+xnpKSH3IBIVuLEfVd6gnuIRbCBZeDsYmvSC1UhqblcuhDwQtnwmtvZB V8qjlApRK1A+8zQhUlC6WLbUSwl1lbLEAWbKPYFl/fph8yWE1uVL7IP1pRIIJ/EeOIWFSR dKe/bbyT/XuW618oN2loGxX1yU1kh7kM9GRYKunUJfisChjE+k6UTLbQv0CAdRxK57WKTY ZtmZQITF0mNagOovVKxB3NTvTxuQ5YU9snC1A5nFJRyPxslnefz2i+TDes1jxA== Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 00:09:31 +0100 From: Dragan Simic To: Kyle Lippincott Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] branch: rework the descriptions of rename and copy operations In-Reply-To: References: <3cbc78bb5729f304b30bf37a18d1762af553aa00.1708022441.git.dsimic@manjaro.org> Message-ID: X-Sender: dsimic@manjaro.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Authentication-Results: ORIGINATING; auth=pass smtp.auth=dsimic@manjaro.org smtp.mailfrom=dsimic@manjaro.org On 2024-02-15 23:56, Kyle Lippincott wrote: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 2:38 PM Dragan Simic > wrote: >> On 2024-02-15 23:31, Kyle Lippincott wrote: >> > Very minor nit: the prevailing style in this document appears to be to >> > have a single space after the period, but it's definitely >> > inconsistent. I don't see anything in Documentation/CodingGuidelines >> > suggesting one way or the other, so don't consider this comment as >> > blocking, just informational. If we want to achieve (eventual) >> > consistency, we may want to use a single space after the period now. >> >> In this case, I went with following the intersentence spacing used in >> the surrounding text. Though, my brain and muscle memory are kind of >> hardcoded to use double spacing, which may not be as prevalent as a >> while >> ago, but IMHO makes reading text rendered using a fixed-width font >> much >> easier. I can adjust if needed, of course. > > No need to adjust if I'm the only one mentioning it. I'm very new to > the project, so please don't take my style nits as any sort of > mandate, since I'm the one that's most likely to be miscalibrated. :) Basically, when it comes to the intersentence spacing, it seems that double spacing has lost its popularity over time. It originates from the old times when mechanical typewriters were used, which most people probably don't even remember these days. :)