From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org,
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>,
"Randall S. Becker" <rsbecker@nexbridge.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] unit-tests: do show relative file paths on non-Windows, too
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 10:44:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c625239a-a847-475a-a228-9deb622c67bf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqle7r9enn.fsf_-_@gitster.g>
Hi Junio
On 11/02/2024 15:58, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>
>> We know which separator we're expecting so we could replace the last
>> two comparisons with
>>
>> prefix[prefix_len -1] != needle[1]
>>
>> but as I say I'm not sure that is worth re-rolling for
>
> There is a larger clean-up opportunity to drop the need for making a
> copy, which probably is worth doing, so I folded the above into this
> version.
Ooh, that's nice. This version looks good, I found the code comments
very helpful
Best Wishes
Phillip
> ------- >8 ------------- >8 ------------- >8 ------------- >8 -------
>
> There are compilers other than Visual C that want to show absolute
> paths. Generalize the helper introduced by a2c5e294 (unit-tests: do
> show relative file paths, 2023-09-25) so that it can also work with
> a path that uses slash as the directory separator, and becomes
> almost no-op once one-time preparation finds out that we are using a
> compiler that already gives relative paths. Incidentally, this also
> should do the right thing on Windows with a compiler that shows
> relative paths but with backslash as the directory separator (if
> such a thing exists and is used to build git).
>
> Reported-by: Randall S. Becker <rsbecker@nexbridge.com>
> Helped-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
> ---
>
> * I found that the diff relative to the result of applying v1 was
> easier to follow than the range-diff, so here it is.
>
> diff --git c/t/unit-tests/test-lib.c w/t/unit-tests/test-lib.c
> index 83c9eb8c59..66d6980ffb 100644
> --- c/t/unit-tests/test-lib.c
> +++ w/t/unit-tests/test-lib.c
> @@ -64,34 +64,33 @@ static const char *make_relative(const char *location)
> * prefix_len == 0 if the compiler gives paths relative
> * to the root of the working tree. Otherwise, we want
> * to see that we did find the needle[] at a directory
> - * boundary.
> + * boundary. Again we rely on that needle[] begins with
> + * "t" followed by the directory separator.
> */
> if (fspathcmp(needle, prefix + prefix_len) ||
> - (prefix_len &&
> - prefix[prefix_len - 1] != '/' &&
> - prefix[prefix_len - 1] != '\\'))
> + (prefix_len && prefix[prefix_len - 1] != needle[1]))
> die("unexpected suffix of '%s'", prefix);
> -
> }
>
> /*
> - * If our compiler gives relative paths and we do not need
> - * to munge directory separator, we can return location as-is.
> + * Does it not start with the expected prefix?
> + * Return it as-is without making it worse.
> */
> - if (!prefix_len && !need_bs_to_fs)
> + if (prefix_len && fspathncmp(location, prefix, prefix_len))
> return location;
>
> - /* Does it not start with the expected prefix? */
> - if (fspathncmp(location, prefix, prefix_len))
> - return location;
> + /*
> + * If we do not need to munge directory separator, we can return
> + * the substring at the tail of the location.
> + */
> + if (!need_bs_to_fs)
> + return location + prefix_len;
>
> - strlcpy(buf, location + prefix_len, sizeof(buf));
> /* convert backslashes to forward slashes */
> - if (need_bs_to_fs) {
> - for (p = buf; *p; p++)
> - if (*p == '\\')
> - *p = '/';
> - }
> + strlcpy(buf, location + prefix_len, sizeof(buf));
> + for (p = buf; *p; p++)
> + if (*p == '\\')
> + *p = '/';
> return buf;
> }
>
>
> t/unit-tests/test-lib.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/t/unit-tests/test-lib.c b/t/unit-tests/test-lib.c
> index 7bf9dfdb95..66d6980ffb 100644
> --- a/t/unit-tests/test-lib.c
> +++ b/t/unit-tests/test-lib.c
> @@ -21,12 +21,11 @@ static struct {
> .result = RESULT_NONE,
> };
>
> -#ifndef _MSC_VER
> -#define make_relative(location) location
> -#else
> /*
> * Visual C interpolates the absolute Windows path for `__FILE__`,
> * but we want to see relative paths, as verified by t0080.
> + * There are other compilers that do the same, and are not for
> + * Windows.
> */
> #include "dir.h"
>
> @@ -34,32 +33,66 @@ static const char *make_relative(const char *location)
> {
> static char prefix[] = __FILE__, buf[PATH_MAX], *p;
> static size_t prefix_len;
> + static int need_bs_to_fs = -1;
>
> - if (!prefix_len) {
> + /* one-time preparation */
> + if (need_bs_to_fs < 0) {
> size_t len = strlen(prefix);
> - const char *needle = "\\t\\unit-tests\\test-lib.c";
> + char needle[] = "t\\unit-tests\\test-lib.c";
> size_t needle_len = strlen(needle);
>
> - if (len < needle_len || strcmp(needle, prefix + len - needle_len))
> - die("unexpected suffix of '%s'", prefix);
> + if (len < needle_len)
> + die("unexpected prefix '%s'", prefix);
> +
> + /*
> + * The path could be relative (t/unit-tests/test-lib.c)
> + * or full (/home/user/git/t/unit-tests/test-lib.c).
> + * Check the slash between "t" and "unit-tests".
> + */
> + prefix_len = len - needle_len;
> + if (prefix[prefix_len + 1] == '/') {
> + /* Oh, we're not Windows */
> + for (size_t i = 0; i < needle_len; i++)
> + if (needle[i] == '\\')
> + needle[i] = '/';
> + need_bs_to_fs = 0;
> + } else {
> + need_bs_to_fs = 1;
> + }
>
> - /* let it end in a directory separator */
> - prefix_len = len - needle_len + 1;
> + /*
> + * prefix_len == 0 if the compiler gives paths relative
> + * to the root of the working tree. Otherwise, we want
> + * to see that we did find the needle[] at a directory
> + * boundary. Again we rely on that needle[] begins with
> + * "t" followed by the directory separator.
> + */
> + if (fspathcmp(needle, prefix + prefix_len) ||
> + (prefix_len && prefix[prefix_len - 1] != needle[1]))
> + die("unexpected suffix of '%s'", prefix);
> }
>
> - /* Does it not start with the expected prefix? */
> - if (fspathncmp(location, prefix, prefix_len))
> + /*
> + * Does it not start with the expected prefix?
> + * Return it as-is without making it worse.
> + */
> + if (prefix_len && fspathncmp(location, prefix, prefix_len))
> return location;
>
> - strlcpy(buf, location + prefix_len, sizeof(buf));
> + /*
> + * If we do not need to munge directory separator, we can return
> + * the substring at the tail of the location.
> + */
> + if (!need_bs_to_fs)
> + return location + prefix_len;
> +
> /* convert backslashes to forward slashes */
> + strlcpy(buf, location + prefix_len, sizeof(buf));
> for (p = buf; *p; p++)
> if (*p == '\\')
> *p = '/';
> -
> return buf;
> }
> -#endif
>
> static void msg_with_prefix(const char *prefix, const char *format, va_list ap)
> {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-12 10:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-11 8:57 [PATCH] unit-tests: do show relative file paths on non-Windows, too Junio C Hamano
2024-02-11 11:03 ` Phillip Wood
2024-02-11 15:58 ` [PATCH v2] " Junio C Hamano
2024-02-12 10:44 ` Phillip Wood [this message]
2024-02-12 22:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-13 10:55 ` Phillip Wood
2024-02-13 17:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-13 19:58 ` Johannes Schindelin
2024-02-13 20:48 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c625239a-a847-475a-a228-9deb622c67bf@gmail.com \
--to=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
--cc=rsbecker@nexbridge.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).