From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Edelen Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Suggested for PU: revision caching system to significantly speed up packing/walking Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 00:53:12 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4A7AEFA8.5010001@drmicha.warpmail.net> <4A7B95A8.2010000@vilain.net> <7vzlabp7e4.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Nicolas Pitre , Johannes Schindelin , Sam Vilain , Michael J Gruber , Jeff King , "Shawn O. Pearce" , Andreas Ericsson , Christian Couder , "git@vger.kernel.org" To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Aug 08 00:53:24 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MZYJP-0003gW-0k for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2009 00:53:23 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755308AbZHGWxO convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Aug 2009 18:53:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754877AbZHGWxO (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Aug 2009 18:53:14 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f214.google.com ([209.85.219.214]:48559 "EHLO mail-ew0-f214.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754797AbZHGWxN convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Aug 2009 18:53:13 -0400 Received: by ewy10 with SMTP id 10so1866392ewy.37 for ; Fri, 07 Aug 2009 15:53:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=TXTJJFd2lo+moWAnLSqpXAjQcsGJ+tpVk5qSSTQ4mok=; b=rxiRu6yGkNPc3gF+uHgmcYEspFeyW9vEE9dBbsPLm8yenT376JpHlMLa4xBECGlKaD yOLQUOHVWJ149NonNZ8/XgCUhUOKItT/UKCimCh7vm9wFO1W5+dSElKU5o1C8lavInkS AAGLUQBMhxzeGmdbcNZaV4JS9P41y/lnnU/PY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=O0k7ZpEsp3zE/7KQWcI3nUFqsXmIBhvFIRTgbd3UZJSjVieHqyAvX1GZkzHayGwXOe Lkm5h+j/Nc+xu+GkFDpmUSkxEyQGDBxUpP1nxwth2B6Ox67ncZBqaqluYQ/80guH6qoe VpEqO/AFRF3cJH9z+8iVmKOnX9YEB5AQ7PRPE= Received: by 10.216.15.68 with SMTP id e46mr325249wee.225.1249685592890; Fri, 07 Aug 2009 15:53:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7vzlabp7e4.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: > Hmm. =A0.git/objects/ as of today is about 482M here, so we are talki= ng > about roughly 10% overhead? Yes, that sounds about right. The cache file for git's repository is 3MB, and my repo (partly packed) is ~35MB. By the way, what would be the best way of posting a revised patchset? Should I just reply to my older posts, or make new ones?