Re: [PATCH 5/6 (v4)] full integration of rev-cache into git, completed test suite

[Nick Edelen <sirnot@gmail.com>]

> ^^ You don't need to write comments like "This patch"; in the history
> such words are meaningless.

I had meant to delete that...

> "tweak" ?

Yeah I had modified the messages and didn't replace the additional
info I deleted.  It's not really important, as it's modified again
(for the last time) in the name-related patch, but here it's revised
to take advantage of the size storage.

>>  - more fluid handling of damaged cache slices
>
> What does this mean?

That it remembers/is aware of bad slices, instead of dumbly attempting
to load them upon each commit.

> This is quite a long commit message.  Is the above detail all useful?
> Can it be split into one patch for each of the above integrations?

Erm, I suppose they could be split, but the changes to revision and
list-objects aren't very big, so I figured it'd be easier/cleaner to
just put everything required for smooth integration into a single
patch.  I dunno, it dosn't seem hugely necessary; the bits modifying
git code are relatively small and already obviously seperate in the
patch.