From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fout-a2-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-a2-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 030BF238C1B for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2025 20:47:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.145 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760474831; cv=none; b=jt5CzcRzhzSFO4dUkf5eHTBrGk8Fb4FdTvyO/85qUHVsLJ8TxmikYDbxY8mZpQBVAMf9CZ2S18HQRXyb0NQ03s0pIMHdFFKKOXA/Zh284h4VyTZ6KuDsVfLbTzp5EGewUq/FdzHSjQl1uzXtw60vLmHF58/BFme7eSntBzCYGDQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760474831; c=relaxed/simple; bh=SKD+GWccwEyWC7kx9zPlI4na0+doh+ya39rPeKZimyA=; h=MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Cc:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: Subject:Content-Type; b=dvisbWdQPplh6OU8e79ayAS8DgsnYDU4/b7E+9kOQDLZKCIp85vfKvTwTK4bKEc+qRzSWRXBcmUKBy1f6paiUeWD+W/d1RBF9wt+WSMjDs/lN0TKIaAzkPhow0OrdoRdsYdwT4QoHATFhSdRA22MYxUJbqLf9eKgQCB8a7RIfoI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=khaugsbakk.name; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=khaugsbakk.name; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=khaugsbakk.name header.i=@khaugsbakk.name header.b=prMPU8Zh; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=ENbqWFyp; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.145 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=khaugsbakk.name Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=khaugsbakk.name Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=khaugsbakk.name header.i=@khaugsbakk.name header.b="prMPU8Zh"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="ENbqWFyp" Received: from phl-compute-09.internal (phl-compute-09.internal [10.202.2.49]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01A10EC099D; Tue, 14 Oct 2025 16:47:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-imap-07 ([10.202.2.97]) by phl-compute-09.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 14 Oct 2025 16:47:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=khaugsbakk.name; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type :date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1760474828; x=1760561228; bh=NitfcqhB+8/I6xYdnf/wD5ZbSMtrVgbL Ioaa3VmOWxc=; b=prMPU8ZhG/MuTjPIeyTXAlAgv43ihVzSpIsf3TzUW33THUn6 4Rha52yxxNRVeMTwiVmIAUEmlXOGTC0TTAA5PeqAY69bPp12roZLDb1eTmdWelpx uaTfWQf9PijhiUNUVfaggQn6dhZZjxH0cZWdWkZETVWfIDU8nbV1TwAwWAVBLTJZ wRKZss0PV+VAiOp9PF5OXDbsIwWaf9Li1pWVFe8EpjZk7hCSJ8Da4NCHVDFwErn4 IGVtTJOXIplglfm2imASrlMWIkjMjVcSwkVQkoxWKkr+tjhro332a14LZiNPdA6w YM4HocAgOKgzpUmp7xnTK7th07v30XrNXfWnwQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1760474828; x= 1760561228; bh=NitfcqhB+8/I6xYdnf/wD5ZbSMtrVgbLIoaa3VmOWxc=; b=E NbqWFypXo2PdX9nolvq1NKsN0PU0OHlPiBeK6msNZkGUxaQAKavCCZ+ZOBEQhRK3 miAroab3YdyOaF+0DPccWPJcJtV0sgZqctQ162qmxk2s8duABFQLqXcmONT7G8oS /HkEXHH595wyFW3+13oEn3/9Hkz8c1Dhzc0/CwK5WFhFKMMPs5/JCtuf3+QqyS94 AKeSEBde9+ZRlsgww8/A2gltYAQDsj4UKMz2mcAe+aewsx+3SCAIL6kf3G1CybvQ Q2KRvWt886r+Cxgi81nLx2YxlNQD91vfrbD9zmHh75vpGSqJuUp1ZLXcapldFZEU 32R8Rqbso+268BI40351A== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtdeggdduvdduhedvucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceu rghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujf gurhepofggfffhvfevkfgjfhfutgfgsehtqhertdertdejnecuhfhrohhmpedfmfhrihhs thhofhhfvghrucfjrghughhssggrkhhkfdcuoegtohguvgeskhhhrghughhssggrkhhkrd hnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepfeetgefhgeefveelgeduvdekteehieevffdu jeelgfduffffjeelffffledukeejnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrg hmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheptghouggvsehkhhgruhhgshgsrghkkhdrnhgrmhgvpdhnsggp rhgtphhtthhopeehpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehkrhhishhtoh hffhgvrhhhrghughhssggrkhhksehfrghsthhmrghilhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehj nhdrrghvihhlrgesfhhrvggvrdhfrhdprhgtphhtthhopehpvghffhesphgvfhhfrdhnvg htpdhrtghpthhtohepshhunhhshhhinhgvsehsuhhnshhhihhnvggtohdrtghomhdprhgt phhtthhopehgihhtsehvghgvrhdrkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i2671468f:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.phl.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 66BFE1EA0062; Tue, 14 Oct 2025 16:47:08 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThreadId: AvBFpqMSI4bk Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 22:46:48 +0200 From: "Kristoffer Haugsbakk" To: "Eric Sunshine" , "Kristoffer Haugsbakk" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Jean-No=C3=ABl_AVILA?= , "Jeff King" Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <978261e3be4.1760043036.git.code@khaugsbakk.name> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] doc: patch-id: convert to the modern synopsis style Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 13, 2025, at 18:53, Eric Sunshine wrote: > On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 12:28=E2=80=AFPM wrote: >> Convert this command documentation to the modern synopsis style based= on >> similar work.[1] Concretely: [...] >> >> Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk >> --- >> diff --git a/Documentation/git-patch-id.adoc b/Documentation/git-patc= h-id.adoc >> @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ git-patch-id - Compute unique ID for a patch >> ---unstable:: >> +`--unstable`:: >> Use an "unstable" hash as the patch ID. With this option, >> the result produced is compatible with the patch-id value pro= duced >> by git 1.9 and older and whitespace is ignored. Users with p= re-existing > > Is the mix of "patch ID" and "patch-id" intentional? If so, should > "patch-id" be wrapped in backticks? I originally assumed that =E2=80=9Cpatch-id=E2=80=9D here meant =E2=80=9C= patch ID` but now I=E2=80=99m not sure (what was intended). The way I read it then made me change all of these =E2=80=9Cpatch-id=E2=80= =9D to =E2=80=9Cpatch ID=E2=80=9D for consistency. That=E2=80=99s a future change/topic.