From: "Giuseppe Bilotta" <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com>
To: "Jakub Narebski" <jnareb@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Petr Baudis" <pasky@suse.cz>,
"Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 4/5] gitweb: parse parent..current syntax from PATH_INFO
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:52:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cb7bb73a0810200752l70e1952dmb8e14a419b02f61b@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200810201118.44654.jnareb@gmail.com>
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
>
>> This patch makes it possible to use an URL such as
>> $project/somebranch..otherbranch:/filename to get a diff between
>> different version of a file. Paths like
>> $project/$action/somebranch:/somefile..otherbranch:/otherfile are parsed
>> as well.
>
> Just a nitpick: why '$project' and '$action', but 'somebranch',
> 'otherbranch' and 'filename'?
Good question ... I think I got distracted along the way.
>> All '*diff' actions and in general actions that use $hash_parent[_base]
>> and $file_parent can now get all of their parameters from PATH_INFO
>
> Which currently mean 'shortlog', and I guess in the future would mean
> also all other log-like views: 'log', 'history', 'search' (the commit
> message kind, not the pickaxe kind), and perhaps also 'rss'/'atom'.
I'm not sure rss/atom makes sense, but the others were already in my
todo list after the shortlog patch, so I'll try to get them ready as
soon as I have the time to refactor them as we discussed on IRC.
> Side note: the regexp below allow for $parentpathname to contain
> '..', but we don't want to rely on such minute detail of implementation
> detail (because it depends on whether we use greedy or non-greedy
> matching there).
>
>> + my ($parentrefname, $parentpathname, $refname, $pathname) =
>> + ($path_info =~ /^(?:(.+?)(?::(.+))?\.\.)?(.+?)(?::(.+))?$/);
Hm, actually it might be a better idea to make the first pathname
match non-greedy.
>> - $input_params{'action'} ||= "blob_plain";
>> + # the default action depends on whether we had parent info
>> + # or not
>> + if ($parentrefname) {
>> + $input_params{'action'} ||= "blobdiff_plain";
>> + } else {
>> + $input_params{'action'} ||= "blob_plain";
>> + }
>
> Nice.
>
> I was wondering about 'project/hash_parent..hash' syntax, but then I have
> realized that it doesn't change action (as in 'blob_plain' -> 'blobdiff_plain'),
> but is always 'shortlog'.
>
> By the way, I wonder if it should be 'blobdiff_plain' or just 'blobdiff'.
> the 'blob_plain' was here to use gitweb as a kind of versioned web
> server; there is no such equivalent for 'p/hbp..hb:f' syntax. On the
> other hand it is consistent behavior, always using *_plain...
Moreover, it allows sending shorter URLs for patches, which are the
ones you usually write by hand.
>> +
>> + # next, handle the 'parent' part, if present
>> + if (defined $parentrefname) {
>> + # a missing pathspec defaults to the 'current' filename, allowing e.g.
>> + # someproject/blobdiff/oldrev..newrev:/filename
>> + if ($parentpathname) {
>> + $parentpathname =~ s,^/+,,;
>> + $parentpathname =~ s,/$,,;
>
> Hmmm... should we strip trailing '/' here?
I must confess I don't remember why I decided that was needed.
--
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-20 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-16 20:27 [PATCHv6 0/5] gitweb: PATH_INFO enhancement Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-10-16 20:27 ` [PATCHv6 1/5] gitweb: parse project/action/hash_base:filename PATH_INFO Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-10-16 20:27 ` [PATCHv6 2/5] gitweb: generate project/action/hash URLs Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-10-16 20:27 ` [PATCHv6 3/5] gitweb: use_pathinfo filenames start with / Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-10-16 20:27 ` [PATCHv6 4/5] gitweb: parse parent..current syntax from PATH_INFO Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-10-16 20:27 ` [PATCHv6 5/5] gitweb: generate parent..current URLs Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-10-19 12:11 ` [PATCH 6/6] gitweb: retrieve snapshot format from PATH_INFO Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-10-19 14:24 ` [PATHv2 6/8] " Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-10-19 14:24 ` [PATHv2 7/8] gitweb: embed snapshot format parameter in PATH_INFO Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-10-19 14:24 ` [PATHv2 8/8] gitweb: make the supported snapshot formats array global Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-11-02 1:54 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-11-02 8:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-01 0:18 ` [PATHv2 7/8] gitweb: embed snapshot format parameter in PATH_INFO Jakub Narebski
2008-11-01 12:57 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-10-21 16:44 ` [PATHv2 6/8] gitweb: retrieve snapshot format from PATH_INFO Jakub Narebski
2008-10-21 18:36 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-10-21 19:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-10-20 10:49 ` [PATCHv6 5/5] gitweb: generate parent..current URLs Jakub Narebski
2008-10-20 14:57 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-10-20 9:18 ` [PATCHv6 4/5] gitweb: parse parent..current syntax from PATH_INFO Jakub Narebski
2008-10-20 14:52 ` Giuseppe Bilotta [this message]
2008-10-18 23:26 ` [PATCHv6 3/5] gitweb: use_pathinfo filenames start with / Jakub Narebski
2008-10-18 23:57 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-10-19 8:43 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-10-18 23:14 ` [PATCHv6 2/5] gitweb: generate project/action/hash URLs Jakub Narebski
2008-10-18 22:41 ` [PATCHv6 1/5] gitweb: parse project/action/hash_base:filename PATH_INFO Jakub Narebski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cb7bb73a0810200752l70e1952dmb8e14a419b02f61b@mail.gmail.com \
--to=giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=pasky@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).