From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Giuseppe Bilotta" Subject: Re: [RFC] Zit: the git-based single file content tracker Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 22:06:44 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4901077A.7050904@gmx.ch> <7vabct3l1e.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Junio C Hamano" , "Jakub Narebski" , "Jean-Luc Herren" , git@vger.kernel.org To: david@lang.hm X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Oct 24 22:08:18 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KtSwy-0005EC-Db for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 22:08:00 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752799AbYJXUGr (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:06:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752822AbYJXUGq (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:06:46 -0400 Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.44.30]:64942 "EHLO yx-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752265AbYJXUGq (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:06:46 -0400 Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 8so370831yxm.1 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:06:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=m/wNxOv0MYl+q8AYS1mYiqzxregAj0gWdPzUM5uXq4s=; b=OeXOForpkFgO93DysfrZtwHg1G0AND/3jiATxR8j4hd9UUvG4VjSjIJlPv4neg7SJ5 ne8AY+XQsAuR30WrWonB/7VL7li/2yybTYdk///8exiq1vep4n3Wk5XVIekpkuvRUWvJ unVCA3lFVPRGZO7XG2K+MqaIVE5IZkLRRvJkE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=NYnsF7WeSLMQJL+fVrIwnhQ8tSyly3DpTLs+gfHVScPUqC8jPPLEflIlAnu+IO/zTi 3CJVM0DxMbzOyYVccT5lntflEfEGnixO1zjT2uVTCkpilRKo+9JbF5dNo/p8WcFUBS8h hM4RRO5K/w5XVqFNxluCA4kLJdcAgcHpnVYI4= Received: by 10.150.12.10 with SMTP id 10mr6490591ybl.46.1224878804814; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:06:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.145.2 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:06:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 9:53 PM, wrote: > I just had what's probably a silly thought. > > how close is a zit setup to a subproject setup? Honestly, I haven't the slightest idea how they work. My understanding, which could be completely wrong, is that they are full-fledged git repositories, and that additional metadata at the top level takes care of understanding what ref is needed for each toplevel project. If this is true, using them wouldn't simplify zit, but rather make it more complex (and space intensive). -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta