From: "Giuseppe Bilotta" <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com>
To: "Jakub Narebski" <jnareb@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Petr Baudis" <pasky@suse.cz>,
"Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gitweb: fixes to gitweb feature check code
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 07:10:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cb7bb73a0811162210iadb7511rc3474272c8e60c59@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200811170202.27893.jnareb@gmail.com>
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 2:02 AM, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Nov 2008, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
>
>> The gitweb_check_feature routine was being used for two different
>> purposes: retrieving the actual feature value (such as the list of
>> snapshot formats or the list of additional actions), and to check if a
>> feature was enabled.
>>
>> For the latter use, since all features return an array, it led to either
>> clumsy code or subtle bugs, with disabled features appearing enabled
>> because (0) evaluates to 1.
>>
>> We fix these bugs, and simplify the code, by separating feature (list)
>> value retrieval (gitweb_get_feature) from boolean feature check (i.e.
>> retrieving the first/only item in the feature value list). Usage of
>> gitweb_check_feature across gitweb is replaced by the appropriate call
>> wherever needed.
>> ---
>
> First, you forgot the signoff, but you have addressed that already.
>
>
> Second, I thought at first that it would be good for the patch to also
> simplify %feature hash, using "'default' => 1" instead of current bit
> convoluted "'default' => [1]", at the cost of bit more code for
> defensive programming. But now I think that if it is to be done,
> it should be put as separate patch.
Is this an ACK? 8-D
--
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-17 6:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-15 14:26 [PATCH] gitweb: fixes to gitweb feature check code Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-11-16 15:30 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-11-16 21:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-16 21:57 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-11-17 1:02 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-11-17 6:10 ` Giuseppe Bilotta [this message]
2008-11-17 9:28 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-11-17 10:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-17 10:48 ` Jakub Narebski
[not found] <Message-ID: <cb7bb73a0811291731g7f8770f7p89e924c00d2ab004@mail.gmail.com>
2008-11-30 1:31 ` [PATCH 3/3] gitweb: make gitweb_check_feature a boolean wrapper Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-11-30 1:34 ` [PATCH] gitweb: fixes to gitweb feature check code Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-12-02 1:53 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-12-02 21:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-12-03 1:21 ` Jakub Narebski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cb7bb73a0811162210iadb7511rc3474272c8e60c59@mail.gmail.com \
--to=giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=pasky@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).