git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Giuseppe Bilotta" <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com>
To: "Jakub Narebski" <jnareb@gmail.com>
Cc: sverre@rabbelier.nl, git@vger.kernel.org,
	"Petr Baudis" <pasky@suse.cz>,
	"Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gitweb: add patch view
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 17:48:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cb7bb73a0811290848j1b77fe89m66ead7cc4f5ca2bb@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200811291710.27891.jnareb@gmail.com>

Wow, I honestly didn't expect this idea to be so successful. I thought
I was the only one using gitweb to send patches around, honestly 8-D

On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Nov 2008, Sverre Rabbelier wrote:
>>
>> If this does what I think it does I would be very happy with this
>> feature :). Only yesterday I wanted to link someone to a patch I put
>> up on repo.or.cz, but instead ended up telling them to download the
>> snapshot.
>
> True. 'commitdiff_plain' wasn't good enough; what's more it suffers
> from the same ambiguity as 'commitdiff', i.e. it is both means to
> show diff _for_ a commit (perhaps selecting one of parents), and
> showing diff _between_ two commits; the new 'patch' always shows
> diff for a commit, or for a series of commits.

Maybe commitdiff should me renamed to just be 'diff'.

Also, I was in doubt about the name for the new view, and I did
consider 'patchset' (which you mention in your email). I chose to
stick with the shorter form in the end, since many people complain
that gitweb already produces paths that are too long.

-- 
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta

  reply	other threads:[~2008-11-29 16:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-29 13:41 [PATCH 0/2] gitweb: patch view Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-11-29 13:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] gitweb: add " Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-11-29 13:41   ` [PATCH 2/2] gitweb: links to patch action in commitdiff and shortlog view Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-11-29 15:43   ` [PATCH 1/2] gitweb: add patch view Sverre Rabbelier
2008-11-29 16:10     ` Jakub Narebski
2008-11-29 16:48       ` Giuseppe Bilotta [this message]
2008-11-29 16:50         ` Sverre Rabbelier
2008-11-30  1:06 ` [PATCH 0/2] gitweb: " Jakub Narebski
2008-11-30  1:44   ` Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-12-01  0:45     ` Jakub Narebski
2008-12-01  1:10       ` Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-12-01 11:02         ` Jakub Narebski
2008-12-03  9:25           ` Giuseppe Bilotta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cb7bb73a0811290848j1b77fe89m66ead7cc4f5ca2bb@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=jnareb@gmail.com \
    --cc=pasky@suse.cz \
    --cc=sverre@rabbelier.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).