From: "Giuseppe Bilotta" <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com>
To: "Jakub Narebski" <jnareb@gmail.com>
Cc: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, "Petr Baudis" <pasky@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [RFCv3 1/2] gitweb: add patch view
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 08:24:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cb7bb73a0812032324m24991c5cydec41203e738fa89@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200812040249.01374.jnareb@gmail.com>
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 2:48 AM, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 01:20, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 12:55 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>>> Giuseppe Bilotta <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com> writes:
>>>> +
>>>> + # The maximum number of patches in a patchset generated in patch
>>>> + # view. Set this to 0 or undef to disable patch view, or to a
>>>> + # negative number to remove any limit.
>>>> + 'patches' => {
>>>> + 'override' => 1,
>>>> + 'default' => [16]},
>
> Errr... you need something like 'sub' => \&feature_patches for override
> to actually work, I think.
Oops, right.
>> I always assumed that the disabled default was related to how invasive
>> the changes would be (to the UI or computationally-wise). As for the
>> overridability, that's actually the only reason why it would make
>> sense to put in the %feature hash ... otherwise a conf-settable
>> $patch_max (as in v2) would have been enough.
>
> Add to that the fact that this patch just adds the new view, like for
> example in the case of 'snapshot' link, which was turned on... but fact,
> it was by default not overridable. I would agree that it can be turned
> on with low limit but not overridable in introductory patch.
Ok, I'll make it non-overridable, and keep this 16 limit for starters.
Or would you suggest even lower?
>>>> sub git_commitdiff {
>>>> my $format = shift || 'html';
>>>> +
>>>> + my $patch_max = gitweb_check_feature('patches');
>>>> + if ($format eq 'patch') {
>>>> + die_error(403, "Patch view not allowed") unless $patch_max;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>
>>> Should you have to pay overhead for the check-feature call even when
>>> the $format is not "patch"?
>>
>> Actually I wasn't sure if I could use my within the if block, and have
>> the value visible outside (it's used further down when picking the
>> options to pass to format-patch). And since it was used in the second
>> patch anyway to choose whether to add the 'patch' link in html view or
>> not, I just put it outside the block.
>
> You have to use _declaration_ ourside block, but assignment can happen
> inside:
>
> + my $patch_max;
> + if ($format eq 'patch') {
> + $patch_max = gitweb_check_feature('patches');
> + die_error(403, "Patch view not allowed") unless $patch_max;
> + }
Right, stupid me.
> (Side note: doesn't it uses spaces instead of tabs for align?)
I'll check.
--
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-04 7:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-03 22:59 [RFCv3 0/2] gitweb: patch view Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-12-03 22:59 ` [RFCv3 1/2] gitweb: add " Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-12-03 22:59 ` [RFCv3 2/2] gitweb: links to patch action in commitdiff and shortlog view Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-12-06 0:53 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-12-06 13:25 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-12-06 15:25 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-12-03 23:55 ` [RFCv3 1/2] gitweb: add patch view Junio C Hamano
2008-12-04 0:20 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-12-04 0:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-12-04 1:48 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-12-04 7:24 ` Giuseppe Bilotta [this message]
2008-12-06 0:34 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-12-06 0:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-12-06 1:09 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-12-06 1:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-12-06 13:01 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-12-06 13:10 ` Petr Baudis
2008-12-06 12:34 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-12-06 13:09 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-12-06 13:46 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cb7bb73a0812032324m24991c5cydec41203e738fa89@mail.gmail.com \
--to=giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=pasky@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).