git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Giuseppe Bilotta" <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com>
To: "Jakub Narebski" <jnareb@gmail.com>
Cc: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org, "Petr Baudis" <pasky@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [RFCv3 1/2] gitweb: add patch view
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 08:24:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cb7bb73a0812032324m24991c5cydec41203e738fa89@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200812040249.01374.jnareb@gmail.com>

On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 2:48 AM, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 01:20, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 12:55 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>>> Giuseppe Bilotta <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com> writes:
>>>> +
>>>> +     # The maximum number of patches in a patchset generated in patch
>>>> +     # view. Set this to 0 or undef to disable patch view, or to a
>>>> +     # negative number to remove any limit.
>>>> +     'patches' => {
>>>> +             'override' => 1,
>>>> +             'default' => [16]},
>
> Errr... you need something like 'sub' => \&feature_patches for override
> to actually work, I think.

Oops, right.

>> I always assumed that the disabled default was related to how invasive
>> the changes would be (to the UI or computationally-wise). As for the
>> overridability, that's actually the only reason why it would make
>> sense to put in the %feature hash ... otherwise a conf-settable
>> $patch_max (as in v2) would have been enough.
>
> Add to that the fact that this patch just adds the new view, like for
> example in the case of 'snapshot' link, which was turned on... but fact,
> it was by default not overridable. I would agree that it can be turned
> on with low limit but not overridable in introductory patch.

Ok, I'll make it non-overridable, and keep this 16 limit for starters.
Or would you suggest even lower?

>>>>  sub git_commitdiff {
>>>>       my $format = shift || 'html';
>>>> +
>>>> +     my $patch_max = gitweb_check_feature('patches');
>>>> +     if ($format eq 'patch') {
>>>> +             die_error(403, "Patch view not allowed") unless $patch_max;
>>>> +     }
>>>> +
>>>
>>> Should you have to pay overhead for the check-feature call even when
>>> the $format is not "patch"?
>>
>> Actually I wasn't sure if I could use my within the if block, and have
>> the value visible outside (it's used further down when picking the
>> options to pass to format-patch). And since it was used in the second
>> patch anyway to choose whether to add the 'patch' link in html view or
>> not, I just put it outside the block.
>
> You have to use _declaration_ ourside block, but assignment can happen
> inside:
>
> +     my $patch_max;
> +     if ($format eq 'patch') {
> +             $patch_max = gitweb_check_feature('patches');
> +             die_error(403, "Patch view not allowed") unless $patch_max;
> +     }

Right, stupid me.

> (Side note: doesn't it uses spaces instead of tabs for align?)

I'll check.

-- 
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta

  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-04  7:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-03 22:59 [RFCv3 0/2] gitweb: patch view Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-12-03 22:59 ` [RFCv3 1/2] gitweb: add " Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-12-03 22:59   ` [RFCv3 2/2] gitweb: links to patch action in commitdiff and shortlog view Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-12-06  0:53     ` Jakub Narebski
2008-12-06 13:25       ` Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-12-06 15:25         ` Jakub Narebski
2008-12-03 23:55   ` [RFCv3 1/2] gitweb: add patch view Junio C Hamano
2008-12-04  0:20     ` Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-12-04  0:40       ` Junio C Hamano
2008-12-04  1:48       ` Jakub Narebski
2008-12-04  7:24         ` Giuseppe Bilotta [this message]
2008-12-06  0:34   ` Jakub Narebski
2008-12-06  0:46     ` Junio C Hamano
2008-12-06  1:09       ` Jakub Narebski
2008-12-06  1:26         ` Junio C Hamano
2008-12-06 13:01       ` Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-12-06 13:10         ` Petr Baudis
2008-12-06 12:34     ` Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-12-06 13:09       ` Jakub Narebski
2008-12-06 13:46         ` Giuseppe Bilotta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cb7bb73a0812032324m24991c5cydec41203e738fa89@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=jnareb@gmail.com \
    --cc=pasky@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).