From: "Giuseppe Bilotta" <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com>
To: "Jakub Narebski" <jnareb@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Petr Baudis" <pasky@suse.cz>,
"Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [RFCv4 1/3] gitweb: add patch view
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:48:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cb7bb73a0812150548w526a8c0eu13ec95785e0ab824@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200812151417.16372.jnareb@gmail.com>
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:
>> + my $patch_max;
>> + if ($format eq 'patch') {
>> + $patch_max = gitweb_check_feature('patches');
>> + die_error(403, "Patch view not allowed") unless $patch_max;
>> + }
>> +
>
> Hmmm... gitweb_check_feature
You're right, it's an abuse. I'll make it gitweb_get_feature()[0]
> I am wondering if we could somehow mark (encode) either $hash_parent
> or number of patches in proposed filename... but I don't think it is
> worth it.
Including hash_parent if defined is quite possible. I'm not sure it's
really worth it considering that the typical usage would be to publish
a patchset for a particular feature (in which case the hash/branch
name would be enough).
>> + } elsif ($format eq 'patch') {
>> + local $/ = undef;
>> + print <$fd>;
>> + close $fd
>> + or print "Reading git-format-patch failed\n";
>
> Nice, although... I'd prefer for Perl expert to say if it is better
> to dump file as a whole in such way (it might be quite large), or
> to do it line by line, i.e. without "local $/ = undef;", or using
> "print while <$fd>;" also without "local $/ = undef;".
I'm just sticking to whatever the existing code does :-)
As soon as you finish the patchset review I'll have a new version
taking into consideration all the other suggestions and remarks I
snipped from this reply.
--
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-15 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-06 15:02 [RFCv4 0/3] gitweb: patch view Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-12-06 15:02 ` [RFCv4 1/3] gitweb: add " Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-12-06 15:02 ` [RFCv4 2/3] gitweb: add patches view Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-12-06 15:02 ` [RFCv4 3/3] gitweb: link to patch(es) view from commit and log views Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-12-16 1:03 ` Jakub Narebski
[not found] ` <cb7bb73a0812160202n1f4f7f4fi7f71455eb42bcd31@mail.gmail.com>
2008-12-16 10:14 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-12-16 11:14 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-12-16 3:14 ` [RFCv4 2/3] gitweb: add patches view Jakub Narebski
[not found] ` <cb7bb73a0812160149j1dcaefccv1caf4a2e589ffebb@mail.gmail.com>
2008-12-16 10:16 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-12-15 13:17 ` [RFCv4 1/3] gitweb: add patch view Jakub Narebski
2008-12-15 13:48 ` Giuseppe Bilotta [this message]
2008-12-15 13:58 ` Jakub Narebski
[not found] <20081207060430.GE4357@ftbfs.org>
2008-12-07 9:52 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cb7bb73a0812150548w526a8c0eu13ec95785e0ab824@mail.gmail.com \
--to=giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=pasky@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).