From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Giuseppe Bilotta" Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 2/3] gitweb: add patches view Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:57:43 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1229422290-6213-1-git-send-email-giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com> <1229422290-6213-3-git-send-email-giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com> <7v4p12hv5q.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <200812181915.48556.jnareb@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Junio C Hamano" , git@vger.kernel.org, "Petr Baudis" To: "Jakub Narebski" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Dec 18 20:59:08 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LDP1U-0003Eq-7K for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:59:04 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752136AbYLRT5q (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:57:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752131AbYLRT5q (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:57:46 -0500 Received: from ik-out-1112.google.com ([66.249.90.183]:53053 "EHLO ik-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752098AbYLRT5p (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:57:45 -0500 Received: by ik-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id c29so134634ika.5 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:57:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=RJ+oiiJw7KpMjdP7eusn3sEXQepgeJBSes0MGIoaaz4=; b=OcPq0rWerEuvDG/lfi2gkbJ4X2dqvIOvM8RALOv0zZGODSoK8UYU5O5k0o4d/OFmIi r+TA+Lk0H5HXmSabR0yqIVbOJ77rlgzgJmtIaTc2Xcmv4sho3Ryr57Je9hGIjT7cIxU0 wOA1PN5K7ypCmw2RweM2gV1aTzNSM5/J0XKec= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=fYjkVWg5FSQr2pLpKuJsPjuqcxrWria9DOse6S/WbS+rKBxEb+nyorZ2w1xHI8A+gK ZzSxDOMd6jFVN0KpTvePBoFkZFz0Ual5C9CXzQEFZCf6YKZzUutsZcD2rDlkM5gr0G39 CCYkDzuLlJaxexnXbZR5RS5rclXzNTqTdOjG8= Received: by 10.210.24.12 with SMTP id 12mr2784054ebx.34.1229630263915; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:57:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.210.136.4 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:57:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <200812181915.48556.jnareb@gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 7:15 PM, Jakub Narebski wrote: > > Just a though, but does it really take much sense to have "patch" and > "patches" views handled in git_commitdiff? I can understand in the > first version, where it was more about better 'commitdiff_plain', but > I wonder about now, where patch(es) view is something between git show > and log_plain format... Wouldn't it be simpler to use separate > subroutine, for example git_format_patch or something? I don't feel like much has changed since the beginning when IYO it made sense to have it part of commitdiff, honestly -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta