From: Giuseppe Bilotta <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com>
To: "Marcel M. Cary" <marcel@oak.homeunix.org>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, jnareb@gmail.com, fg@one2team.net, pasky@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] gitweb: Fix warnings with override permitted but no repo override
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:41:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cb7bb73a0902172341x2265e9d4r24a16ef2913bcda6@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1234926043-7471-1-git-send-email-marcel@oak.homeunix.org>
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 4:00 AM, Marcel M. Cary <marcel@oak.homeunix.org> wrote:
> When a feature like "blame" is permitted to be overridden in the
> repository configuration but it is not actually set in the
> repository, a warning is emitted due to the undefined value
> of the repository configuration, even though it's a perfectly
> normal condition.
>
> The warning is grounds for test failure in the gitweb test script,
> so it causes some new feature tests of mine to fail.
>
> This patch prevents warning and adds a test case to exercise it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcel M. Cary <marcel@oak.homeunix.org>
> ---
>
> Here's a small patch I put together while tinkering with bug hyperlinking.
> Does this look reasonable?
My only perplexity is about this:
> @@ -1978,6 +1978,8 @@ sub git_get_project_config {
> $config_file = "$git_dir/config";
> }
>
> + return undef if (!defined $config{"gitweb.$key"});
> +
I'm no Perl expert, so I have no idea: how do non-bool config checks
(which expect arrays) cope with an undef? Also, you may want to add a
non-bool override test in the test suite.
--
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-18 7:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-08 19:07 [RFC] Configuring (future) committags support in gitweb Jakub Narebski
2008-11-08 20:02 ` Francis Galiegue
2008-11-08 22:35 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-11-08 23:27 ` Francis Galiegue
2008-11-09 0:25 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-02-17 15:32 ` [RFC] Configuring (future) committags support in gitweb, especially bug linking Marcel M. Cary
2009-02-18 3:00 ` [PATCH RFC 1/2] gitweb: Fix warnings with override permitted but no repo override Marcel M. Cary
2009-02-18 7:41 ` Giuseppe Bilotta [this message]
2009-02-18 8:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-18 13:09 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-02-18 19:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-18 3:00 ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] gitweb: Hyperlink multiple git hashes on the same commit message line Marcel M. Cary
2009-02-18 21:55 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-02-20 8:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-20 11:46 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-02-24 15:38 ` Addresses with full names in patch emails Marcel M. Cary
2009-02-24 15:58 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-02-24 16:33 ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] gitweb: Hyperlink multiple git hashes on the same commit message line Marcel M. Cary
2009-02-18 3:38 ` [RFC] Configuring (future) committags support in gitweb, especially bug linking Jakub Narebski
2009-02-19 17:08 ` Marcel M. Cary
2009-06-19 14:13 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] gitweb: Hyperlink various committags in commit message with regex Marcel M. Cary
2009-06-22 11:18 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-11-18 6:22 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] Second round of committag series Marcel M. Cary
2009-11-18 6:22 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] gitweb: Hyperlink committags in a commit message by regex matching Marcel M. Cary
2009-11-18 6:22 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] gitweb: Add second-stage matching of bug IDs in bugzilla committag Marcel M. Cary
2009-11-18 6:22 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] gitweb: Allow finer-grained override controls for committags Marcel M. Cary
2009-11-18 6:22 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] gitweb: Allow committag pattern matches to span multiple lines Marcel M. Cary
2009-11-18 6:22 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] gitweb: Allow per-repository definition of new committags Marcel M. Cary
2009-11-18 6:22 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] gitweb: Add _defaults_ keyword for feature lists in project config Marcel M. Cary
2009-11-18 8:20 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] gitweb: Hyperlink committags in a commit message by regex matching Petr Baudis
2009-11-18 8:26 ` Petr Baudis
2009-11-20 23:24 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] Second round of committag series Jakub Narebski
2009-06-19 14:13 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] gitweb: Add second-stage matching of bug IDs in bugzilla committag Marcel M. Cary
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cb7bb73a0902172341x2265e9d4r24a16ef2913bcda6@mail.gmail.com \
--to=giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com \
--cc=fg@one2team.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=marcel@oak.homeunix.org \
--cc=pasky@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).