From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Giuseppe Bilotta Subject: Re: [PATCHv1bis 1/2] git apply: option to ignore whitespace differences Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 23:05:40 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1246556921-5819-1-git-send-email-giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com> <1246556921-5819-2-git-send-email-giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com> <7vvdmb6ium.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vhbxu6f87.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vws6q3in0.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Robert Fitzsimons To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jul 02 23:06:11 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MMTTt-00063J-Sc for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:06:10 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754181AbZGBVF7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jul 2009 17:05:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754110AbZGBVF7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jul 2009 17:05:59 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f225.google.com ([209.85.218.225]:63821 "EHLO mail-bw0-f225.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753509AbZGBVF6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jul 2009 17:05:58 -0400 Received: by bwz25 with SMTP id 25so1488480bwz.37 for ; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 14:06:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=NGNTTCsd0DcsuTBx9/YrSptvEcB53jhg7dJNziamkXw=; b=OqKc9B4iydZMqe2jw3ay8NqqjprooHP5gnUnr3XV/IyxJppjcGMvHH12V7YbRKCYZ1 MqB++DYyI18cwZw3U2ZoBNeaPAteCg2MjPOHH/FY2hfOvhDp4sdGKs8RKXJeEjb28fqk 6wFhfAwLxm3nFjx9/p/nukzK0fZbYPwSL2lXQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=DZEsyb3bIGTd9MRX0r5ch3mHvTYtjrQjl/jog1nTFrJsXjAR7CBjZpzA9ZGRS+Vh/U qU99N9dL9c6IRpy5IovYT5yNld+/byxThaU+fbbmtzha21gZHyH6oErajf+EGr2EYJIy Rb6guzY+kElBOnVq9a6ayhX/Q6JlZ68IU9yXg= Received: by 10.204.70.135 with SMTP id d7mr447699bkj.87.1246568760174; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 14:06:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7vws6q3in0.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Giuseppe Bilotta writes: > >> I do wonder what makes the patch 'unreviewable', since I assume that >> doesn't mean just 'does not include the refactoring I requested'. > > Ok, unreviewable may not be the word, and "it is apparent that the patch > has not been well thought through" is the word I would want. > > IOW, it really should have been marked as "[RFC/PATCH]". Ah yes, I keep forgetting about that. I remembered it on the very first try (actually, I wrote PATCH/RFC), but then I forgot about it in the next rounds. -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta