Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Abhinav Gupta" <mail@abhinavg.net>
To: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: "Phillip Wood" <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org, "Derrick Stolee" <stolee@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rebase: ignore non-branch update-refs
Date: Sun, 10 May 2026 17:33:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cc21dea8-2184-4db9-9aaf-6cd6910095f8@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqmry6x0dm.fsf@gitster.g>


On Sun, May 10, 2026, at 17:20, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I smell that you'd be suggesting to replace the patch we have
> discussed with another one that declares that it is a bug to use %d
> in insn format?  I do not think how well it would fly.

No, I didn't meant to imply that. I'm happy with the patch as-is.

Using %d in insn format is desirable, and I would not try to remove that.
I ran into this issue because of my own use of %d in insn format.

I was sharing an additional example for how this currently misbehaves:
not only does it generate the 'update-ref HEAD' in interactive contexts,
but it also breaks all non-interactive rebases with a non-empty todo list.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-11  0:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-06  2:39 [PATCH] rebase: ignore non-branch update-refs mail
2026-05-07 16:08 ` Phillip Wood
2026-05-08  1:58 ` [PATCH v2] " mail
2026-05-08 10:07   ` Phillip Wood
2026-05-10 22:41   ` [PATCH v3 0/1] " mail
2026-05-10 22:41     ` [PATCH v3 1/1] " mail
2026-05-10  1:11 ` [PATCH] " Junio C Hamano
2026-05-10 13:37   ` Phillip Wood
2026-05-10 23:37     ` Junio C Hamano
2026-05-11  0:15       ` Abhinav Gupta
2026-05-11  0:20         ` Junio C Hamano
2026-05-11  0:33           ` Abhinav Gupta [this message]
2026-05-12 15:10         ` Phillip Wood
2026-05-15 15:40     ` Phillip Wood

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cc21dea8-2184-4db9-9aaf-6cd6910095f8@app.fastmail.com \
    --to=mail@abhinavg.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
    --cc=stolee@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox