From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Franck Subject: Re: [RFC] shallow clone Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 09:37:38 +0100 Message-ID: References: <7voe1uchet.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <43DDFF5C.30803@hogyros.de> <7v64o18qn4.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: Simon Richter , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jan 31 09:38:00 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F3r1F-0007mh-Tq for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 09:37:48 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030369AbWAaIhj (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2006 03:37:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965059AbWAaIhj (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2006 03:37:39 -0500 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.197]:26358 "EHLO zproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965055AbWAaIhj convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2006 03:37:39 -0500 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 14so1251905nzn for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:37:38 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=LVAwGVbSXVUMQd14cl7B+KgwlQA5A8wVW0S6ZcVfeh5ypKggwUmjlMHucFwmWxbd+kb3WAztSdupKYvKsR4En3ErGNncUBh3xVdhboi3UvWaymcMbPD5ZoZccszqfZjLcGd4kXcVcLf5WGByPH7d3E63S+EgHRZ4YzjWmrfGsIw= Received: by 10.37.13.2 with SMTP id q2mr5527021nzi; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:37:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.49.12 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:37:38 -0800 (PST) To: Junio C Hamano In-Reply-To: <7v64o18qn4.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: 2006/1/30, Junio C Hamano : > Simon Richter writes: > > >> - disallow fetching from this repo, and > > > > Why? It's perfectly acceptable to pull from an incomplete repo, as > > long as you don't care about the old history. > > I agree. As long as the cloned one can record itself as a > shallow one (and with what epochs), I do not see a reason to > forbid second generation clone from a shallow repository. > I agree too > Cauterizing is not any more special than other grafts entries. > If you have grafted historical kernel repository behind the > official kernel repository with 2.6.12-rc2 epoch, I do not think > of any reason to forbid people from cloning such with the > grafts. > I built my public repository from a cautorized one and everybody who is pulling from mine is aware of the lack of the full history but they actually don't care. If someone is pulling from my repo, he actually wants to work on my project which do not need any old thing... Thanks -- Franck