Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kristoffer Haugsbakk" <kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com>
To: "Harald Nordgren" <haraldnordgren@gmail.com>,
	"Phillip Wood" <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Cc: "D. Ben Knoble" <ben.knoble@gmail.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org, GGG <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] branch: let --delete-merged find squash merged branches
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2026 10:16:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cf3bb2a4-5956-4ba5-9957-b0598f22a122@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHwyqnWkTvicU+U99j0MzzUUXeVnUj=FJJwUDR1F7DGk1hmtrA@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Oct 8, 2026, at 20:42, Harald Nordgren wrote:
>> Even an efficient implementation is going to be a lot slower when it is
>> trying to find branches that have been squashed, so I think we probably
>> do want a way to turn it off. That's especially true in partial clones
>> where we'll have to download a bunch of blobs to do the squash
>> detection. So long as it isn't diabolically slow enabling it by default
>> is probably fine.
>
> A bit slower (depends on how much!) could be worth it for improved
> usability. This is not a command that users will run multiple times a
> day.

I would really like a solid delete operation that I can run, say,
overnight. I have better hygiene practices today but I didn’t back then,
so things have piled up.

One big cleanup is worth a nightly run. So I don’t care about how slow
it is.

>[snip]

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-09  8:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-29  7:30 [PATCH] branch: let --delete-merged find squash merged branches Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
2026-09-29  7:46 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2026-09-29  7:52   ` Harald Nordgren
2026-09-29  8:08     ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2026-09-29 11:18       ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-29 13:31         ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2026-09-29 11:26 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-29 13:44   ` Harald Nordgren
2026-09-29 13:52   ` Harald Nordgren
2026-09-29 15:28     ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-29 18:34       ` Harald Nordgren
2026-10-04  9:54   ` Phillip Wood
2026-10-04 22:28     ` Harald Nordgren
2026-10-08 15:25       ` Phillip Wood
2026-10-08 18:42         ` Harald Nordgren
2026-10-09  8:16           ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk [this message]
2026-10-09 11:11             ` Harald Nordgren
2026-10-09 11:18           ` Harald Nordgren
2026-10-09 13:40             ` Phillip Wood
2026-10-09 13:37           ` Phillip Wood
2026-10-09 15:27             ` Harald Nordgren
2026-10-08 17:51     ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-10-09 13:34       ` Phillip Wood
2026-10-11  9:41 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
2026-10-11  9:41   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
2026-10-11  9:41   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] branch: add --no-squashed to skip the squash search Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cf3bb2a4-5956-4ba5-9957-b0598f22a122@app.fastmail.com \
    --to=kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com \
    --cc=ben.knoble@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=haraldnordgren@gmail.com \
    --cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox