From: Brad King <brad.king@kitware.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: gitster@pobox.com, newren@gmail.com, jrnieder@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/3] merge-recursive: Avoid diagnostic on empty work tree
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 09:45:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1390833624.git.brad.king@kitware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1390592626.git.brad.king@kitware.com>
Hi Folks,
Here is the third revision of this series. The previous
revisions can be found at $gmane/241009 and $gmane/241030.
Updates since the previous revision of the series:
* Handling of lstat ENOENT has been moved down into refresh_cache_ent
and activated by a new CE_MATCH_IGNORE_MISSING option.
* Rather than adding a new argument to make_cache_entry, the existing
'refresh' boolean argument has been generalized to a set of options.
This required the addition of a new CE_MATCH_REFRESH option to
enable refresh with no other options.
Thanks,
-Brad
Brad King (4):
t3030-merge-recursive: Test known breakage with empty work tree
read-cache.c: Refactor --ignore-missing implementation
read-cache.c: Extend make_cache_entry refresh flag with options
merge-recursive.c: Tolerate missing files while refreshing index
cache.h | 6 +++++-
merge-recursive.c | 4 +++-
read-cache.c | 27 ++++++++++++++------------
t/t3030-merge-recursive.sh | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
--
1.8.5.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-27 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CABPp-BGAsrrjcZxVirzKU_VEyUM1U=4TFj18CieKKE7==c7v2A@mail.gmail.com>
2014-01-24 15:01 ` [PATCH/RFC 0/3] merge-recursive: Avoid diagnostic on empty work tree Brad King
2014-01-24 15:01 ` [PATCH/RFC 1/3] t3030-merge-recursive: Test known breakage with " Brad King
2014-01-24 16:51 ` Jonathan Nieder
2014-01-24 17:50 ` Brad King
2014-01-24 15:01 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/3] read-cache.c: Thread lstat error through make_cache_entry signature Brad King
2014-01-24 15:01 ` [PATCH/RFC 3/3] merge-recursive: Tolerate missing file when HEAD is up to date Brad King
[not found] ` <CABPp-BEK9+_ebRiodCp59DHJZExYn3N1jjtBsikSmwt-s_v_0A@mail.gmail.com>
2014-01-24 19:37 ` Fwd: " newren
2014-01-24 19:45 ` Brad King
2014-01-24 19:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-24 20:02 ` Brad King
2014-01-24 20:10 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] merge-recursive: Avoid diagnostic on empty work tree Brad King
2014-01-24 20:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] t3030-merge-recursive: Test known breakage with " Brad King
2014-01-24 20:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] read-cache.c: Optionally tolerate missing files in make_cache_entry Brad King
2014-01-24 20:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-24 20:10 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] merge-recursive.c: Tolerate missing files while refreshing index Brad King
2014-01-27 14:45 ` Brad King [this message]
2014-01-27 14:45 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] t3030-merge-recursive: Test known breakage with empty work tree Brad King
2014-01-27 14:45 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] read-cache.c: Refactor --ignore-missing implementation Brad King
2014-01-27 17:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-27 14:45 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] read-cache.c: Extend make_cache_entry refresh flag with options Brad King
2014-01-27 14:45 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] merge-recursive.c: Tolerate missing files while refreshing index Brad King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1390833624.git.brad.king@kitware.com \
--to=brad.king@kitware.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).