git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: karthik nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>,
	Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>,
	James Liu <james@jamesliu.io>
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/3] reftable: graceful concurrent writes
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 11:59:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1726653185.git.ps@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1726578382.git.ps@pks.im>

Hi,

this is the third version of my patch series that implements support for
graceful concurrent writes with the reftable backend.

There is only a single change compared to v2, namely that we handle `0`
and `-1` for the lock timeout config. With `0` we fail immediately, with
`-1` we lock indefinitely. This matches semantics of loose and packed
ref locking.

Thanks!

Patrick

Patrick Steinhardt (3):
  refs/reftable: introduce "reftable.lockTimeout"
  reftable/stack: allow locking of outdated stacks
  refs/reftable: reload locked stack when preparing transaction

 Documentation/config/reftable.txt |  8 ++++
 refs/reftable-backend.c           | 13 +++++-
 reftable/reftable-stack.h         | 13 +++++-
 reftable/reftable-writer.h        | 11 +++++
 reftable/stack.c                  | 38 ++++++++++++------
 t/t0610-reftable-basics.sh        | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 t/unit-tests/t-reftable-stack.c   | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 7 files changed, 189 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

Range-diff against v2:
1:  700a35df125 ! 1:  77cffd3b1eb refs/reftable: introduce "reftable.lockTimeout"
    @@ Documentation/config/reftable.txt: reftable.geometricFactor::
     +	Whenever the reftable backend appends a new table to the stack, it has
     +	to lock the central "tables.list" file before updating it. This config
     +	controls how long the process will wait to acquire the lock in case
    -+	another process has already acquired it. Default is 100 (i.e., retry
    -+	for 100ms).
    ++	another process has already acquired it. Value 0 means not to retry at
    ++	all; -1 means to try indefinitely. Default is 100 (i.e., retry for
    ++	100ms).
     
      ## refs/reftable-backend.c ##
     @@ refs/reftable-backend.c: static int reftable_be_config(const char *var, const char *value,
    @@ refs/reftable-backend.c: static int reftable_be_config(const char *var, const ch
      			die("reftable geometric factor cannot exceed %u", (unsigned)UINT8_MAX);
      		opts->auto_compaction_factor = factor;
     +	} else if (!strcmp(var, "reftable.locktimeout")) {
    -+		unsigned long lock_timeout = git_config_ulong(var, value, ctx->kvi);
    ++		int64_t lock_timeout = git_config_int64(var, value, ctx->kvi);
    ++		if (lock_timeout > LONG_MAX)
    ++			die("reftable lock timeout cannot exceed %"PRIdMAX, (intmax_t)LONG_MAX);
    ++		if (lock_timeout < 0 && lock_timeout != -1)
    ++			die("reftable lock timeout does not support negative values other than -1");
     +		opts->lock_timeout_ms = lock_timeout;
      	}
      
    @@ reftable/reftable-writer.h: struct reftable_write_options {
     +	 * Note that this does not apply to locking individual tables, as these
     +	 * should only ever be locked when already holding the "tables.list"
     +	 * lock.
    ++	 *
    ++	 * Passing 0 will fail immediately when the file is locked, passing a
    ++	 * negative value will cause us to block indefinitely.
     +	 */
    -+	unsigned lock_timeout_ms;
    ++	long lock_timeout_ms;
      };
      
      /* reftable_block_stats holds statistics for a single block type */
2:  f4be0966e17 = 2:  6130565498e reftable/stack: allow locking of outdated stacks
3:  111b497ef17 = 3:  25d4e513a36 refs/reftable: reload locked stack when preparing transaction
-- 
2.46.0.551.gc5ee8f2d1c.dirty


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-09-18  9:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-17 13:43 [PATCH 0/3] reftable: graceful concurrent writes Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-17 13:43 ` [PATCH 1/3] refs/reftable: introduce "reftable.lockTimeout" Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-17 17:46   ` karthik nayak
2024-09-17 17:50     ` Eric Sunshine
2024-09-18  4:31       ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-18  4:31     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-17 13:43 ` [PATCH 2/3] reftable/stack: allow locking of outdated stacks Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-17 13:43 ` [PATCH 3/3] refs/reftable: reload locked stack when preparing transaction Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-17 18:26 ` [PATCH 0/3] reftable: graceful concurrent writes karthik nayak
2024-09-18  4:31   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-18  4:32 ` [PATCH v2 " Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-18  4:32   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] refs/reftable: introduce "reftable.lockTimeout" Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-18  9:22     ` James Liu
2024-09-18  9:39       ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-18  4:32   ` [PATCH v2 2/3] reftable/stack: allow locking of outdated stacks Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-18  9:26     ` James Liu
2024-09-18  9:39       ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-18  4:32   ` [PATCH v2 3/3] refs/reftable: reload locked stack when preparing transaction Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-18  9:33   ` [PATCH v2 0/3] reftable: graceful concurrent writes James Liu
2024-09-18  9:59 ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2024-09-18  9:59   ` [PATCH v3 1/3] refs/reftable: introduce "reftable.lockTimeout" Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-19 21:34     ` Junio C Hamano
2024-09-18  9:59   ` [PATCH v3 2/3] reftable/stack: allow locking of outdated stacks Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-20 18:10     ` Junio C Hamano
2024-09-24  5:33       ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-18  9:59   ` [PATCH v3 3/3] refs/reftable: reload locked stack when preparing transaction Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-18 23:23   ` [PATCH v3 0/3] reftable: graceful concurrent writes James Liu
2024-09-24  5:33     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-24  5:32 ` [PATCH v4 " Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-24  5:33   ` [PATCH v4 1/3] refs/reftable: introduce "reftable.lockTimeout" Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-24  5:33   ` [PATCH v4 2/3] reftable/stack: allow locking of outdated stacks Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-24  5:33   ` [PATCH v4 3/3] refs/reftable: reload locked stack when preparing transaction Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-27  4:07     ` Jeff King
2024-09-30  6:49       ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-30 22:19       ` Josh Steadmon
2024-10-01  4:27         ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-10-01 22:54           ` Jeff King
2024-10-01 23:24             ` Junio C Hamano
2024-10-02 10:58               ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-10-01  7:34         ` Junio C Hamano
2024-10-01 18:53           ` Josh Steadmon
2024-10-01 19:08             ` Jeff King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cover.1726653185.git.ps@pks.im \
    --to=ps@pks.im \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=james@jamesliu.io \
    --cc=karthik.188@gmail.com \
    --cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).