Re: Binary files in format-patch

["Caio Marcelo" <cmarcelo@gmail.com>]

>  > Their contents are not relevant for us, and doesn't help much in a
>  > mailing list. Taking a peek at the code I've found out this:
>
>  Why then are they committed in Git and being modified?  If the
>  files aren't relevant, why are they tracked?

Sorry, I wasn't very clear there. The binary content is mostly icons,
that get added and updated now and then, so outside of the scope of
our code review mailing list -- but relevant to the project itself.
(The patches themselves are accessible by other means other than the
ML too, so reviewers can pull and get proper versions).

Considering that, any of the proposed solutions make more sense now? :-)


Cheers,
  Caio Marcelo