From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
To: "D. Ben Knoble" <ben.knoble@gmail.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Eli Barzilay <eli@barzilay.org>,
Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] stash: clean up index-mode test merge
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2026 16:52:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d3adb734-2b84-4d7b-b245-5407ee410eb4@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1790803471.git.ben.knoble@gmail.com>
Hi Ben
On 30/09/2026 22:24, D. Ben Knoble wrote:
>
> Changes in v5:
> • Rebase on synthetic merge for the test interaction with t5520
> (dropping old 4/5) [59d1ce1b6e (Merge branch 'tb/t5520-reflog-expire'
> into dk/stash-apply-index-incore, 2026-09-29)]
> • Fix handling of tri-state merge_result.clean
The range-diff below looks as expected, thanks for working on this, I'm
really pleased to see us removing some subprocesses from "git stash".
Thanks
Phillip
> Changes in v4:
> • Drop merge verbosity changes altogether. I was going to
> save-and-restore, but when looking at the index-merge test case (more
> below) closer, I noticed that "git apply --cached" reports conflicts
> on stderr. That is, "git stash apply --index" would report conflicts,
> and silencing the merge takes that away. So instead let's leave the
> configured verbosity alone.
> • Only copy resulting index merge tree OID when successful
> • Fix interaction with t5520 (new patch 4/5)
> • Squash test from 3/5 into 5/5, since it requires actually merging
> trees. I've elected to keep it a separate test for now (contrary to
> Phillip's suggestion) since it's written and working. Adapting
> existing tests requires quite a bit more digging into implicit context
> assumptions ;)
>
> Changes in v3:
>
> • Change conflict label for current index
> • Fix memory leak of merge_result
> • Fix order of trees to make the correct merge (cherry-pick)
> • New test (3/5) to validate this
> • Fix test in 4/5 to assert more details of expected state
>
> Changes in v2:
>
> • Do give branch labels for the incore merge, although they are never
> seen (and clarify commit message as a result, also keeping the
> merge-ort asserts). Phillip was right: without those, we do segfault
> on conflicts.
> • Use the ui merge options to keep the same diff algorithm.
> • Use merge_finalize instead of clear_merge_options, and reuse the
> options between merge calls if they are already initialized.
> • Add a new 2/4 to simplify merge options initialization.
> • Add a new 3/4 with a test case for conflicted index merges.
>
> v1: <cover.1789853192.git.ben.knoble@gmail.com>
> v2: <cover.1790168285.git.ben.knoble@gmail.com>
> v3: <cover.1790425008.git.ben.knoble@gmail.com>
> v4: <cover.1790684309.git.ben.knoble@gmail.com>
>
> [1/4] builtin/stash: remove unused header
> [2/4] stash: prepare merge options earlier
> [3/4] t3903: test failed "stash apply --index"
> [4/4] builtin/stash: merge index in-core
>
> builtin/stash.c | 94 +++++++++++++-----------------------------------
> t/t3903-stash.sh | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> t/t7600-merge.sh | 9 +++++
> 3 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
>
> Diff-intervalle contre v4 :
> 1: 6a165c4df4 = 1: d8f4c36459 builtin/stash: remove unused header
> 2: 35b64ae321 = 2: 8e99033ef0 stash: prepare merge options earlier
> 3: 7b0b317ce0 = 3: ee28d0a840 t3903: test failed "stash apply --index"
> 4: 2ac371d2dc < -: ---------- t5520: don't expire reflogs where it matters
> 5: e21b832a6e ! 4: ca3de1d4a3 builtin/stash: merge index in-core
> @@ builtin/stash.c: static enum stash_apply_result do_apply_stash(const char *prefi
> + merge_incore_nonrecursive(&o, merge_base, head, merge,
> + &result);
> +
> -+ if (!result.clean) {
> ++ if (result.clean < 0) {
> ++ merge_finalize(&o, &result);
> ++ return error(_("index merge failed"));
> ++ } else if (!result.clean) {
> + merge_finalize(&o, &result);
> return error(_("conflicts in index. "
> "Try without --index."));
>
> base-commit: a018953688f1b10bddf91bff8747068f5f4746a4
> prerequisite-patch-id: 601853fa5478b0dbfb260ba02632418e90338219
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-01 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-19 21:26 [PATCH 0/2] Hi all, D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-19 21:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] builtin/stash: remove unused header D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-21 15:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-19 21:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] builtin/stash: merge index in-core D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-21 13:17 ` Phillip Wood
2026-09-22 12:43 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-22 12:51 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-22 13:57 ` Phillip Wood
2026-09-22 20:34 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-19 21:32 ` [PATCH 0/2] Hi all, D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-23 12:58 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] stash: clean up index-mode test merge D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-23 12:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] builtin/stash: remove unused header D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-23 12:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] stash: prepare merge options earlier D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-23 12:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] t: test failed "stash apply --index" D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-24 9:42 ` Phillip Wood
2026-09-25 13:36 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-25 15:45 ` Phillip Wood
2026-09-26 9:53 ` Phillip Wood
2026-09-26 12:07 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-23 12:58 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] builtin/stash: merge index in-core D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-24 9:42 ` Phillip Wood
2026-09-25 12:55 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-25 15:58 ` Phillip Wood
2026-09-25 16:16 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-24 21:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-25 4:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-25 13:00 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-25 16:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-26 9:51 ` Phillip Wood
2026-09-26 12:04 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-25 16:04 ` Phillip Wood
2026-09-25 16:17 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-25 16:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-26 12:16 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] stash: clean up index-mode test merge D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-26 12:16 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] builtin/stash: remove unused header D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-26 12:16 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] stash: prepare merge options earlier D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-26 12:16 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] t3903: test stash --index merges D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-28 15:44 ` Phillip Wood
2026-09-28 15:55 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-29 9:41 ` Phillip Wood
2026-09-26 12:16 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] t3903: test failed "stash apply --index" D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-26 12:16 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] builtin/stash: merge index in-core D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-27 18:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-28 12:02 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-28 9:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-28 12:03 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-28 15:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-26 12:20 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] stash: clean up index-mode test merge D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-27 19:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-28 9:50 ` Phillip Wood
2026-09-28 12:05 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-28 12:33 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-28 13:00 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-28 13:45 ` Phillip Wood
2026-09-28 14:50 ` Thomas Bachem
2026-09-28 15:36 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-29 11:38 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-29 15:54 ` Phillip Wood
2026-09-28 15:40 ` Phillip Wood
2026-09-29 12:18 ` [PATCH v4 " D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-29 12:18 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] builtin/stash: remove unused header D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-29 12:18 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] stash: prepare merge options earlier D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-29 12:18 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] t3903: test failed "stash apply --index" D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-29 12:18 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] t5520: don't expire reflogs where it matters D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-29 15:46 ` Phillip Wood
2026-09-29 12:18 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] builtin/stash: merge index in-core D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-29 20:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-30 1:29 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-29 15:48 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] stash: clean up index-mode test merge Phillip Wood
2026-09-29 17:31 ` Ben Knoble
2026-09-30 21:26 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-30 21:24 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] " D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-30 21:24 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] builtin/stash: remove unused header D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-30 21:24 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] stash: prepare merge options earlier D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-30 21:24 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] t3903: test failed "stash apply --index" D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-30 21:24 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] builtin/stash: merge index in-core D. Ben Knoble
2026-10-01 15:52 ` Phillip Wood [this message]
2026-10-01 17:47 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] stash: clean up index-mode test merge Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d3adb734-2b84-4d7b-b245-5407ee410eb4@gmail.com \
--to=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
--cc=ben.knoble@gmail.com \
--cc=eli@barzilay.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox