git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Scott Chacon" <schacon@gmail.com>
To: "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>
Cc: "Nicolas Pitre" <nico@cam.org>,
	"Pierre Habouzit" <madcoder@debian.org>,
	david@lang.hm, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: libgit2 - a true git library
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 18:07:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d411cc4a0811011807g229f8becs9f411d6e19fb6c12@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d411cc4a0811011726h1fb1ad0ct5c37af753940f4a4@mail.gmail.com>

> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> wrote:
>> Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
>>>
>>> > My take on the consensus for the license part of the discussion is
>>> > that libgit2 should be under the "GPL gcc library" license.
>>> >
>>> > BTW, I can't actually find a copy of that license; the only thing
>>> > I can locate in the GCC SVN tree is a copy of the LGPL.
>>>
>>> The exception is usually found at the top of files constituting
>>> libgcc.a.  One example is gcc/config/arm/ieee754-df.S.  ;-)
>>
>> Headers updated.  Its now GPL+gcc library exception.
>>
>> Not that the 5 lines of useful code there really needs copyright,
>> but hey, whatever.

I guess my main concern is that if a company wanted to direct
resources at supporting Git in something (say, an editor or GUI or
whatnot), and that company is of _any_ size, they are going to have to
get their legal department to review this strange and almost totally
unused license - only knowing that it's barely different than GPL and
they know GPL will not fly.  LGPL will likely be known to them and a
policy may already be in place.

Think about trying to incorporate this into something proprietary,
Shawn - how much of a pain is it going to be to get that license
reviewed in Google?  However, LGPL I'm sure there is already a
reviewed policy.  Now, since that may be a pain, time that Shawn could
have been spending being paid to work on the library is lost because
they can't use it, or it takes weeks/months to review it.  That's my
concern.

I personally would rather see it BSD or something more permissive so
that no human has to waste even a second of their valuable time
figuring out if they can work with it or not, but I understand that
many people here are much more protective of their code.  I simply
think that LGPL is a much more widely used and understood compromise
that affords nearly the same protectionism.

Scott

>>
>> --
>> Shawn.
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2008-11-02  1:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-31 17:07 libgit2 - a true git library Shawn O. Pearce
2008-10-31 17:28 ` Pieter de Bie
2008-10-31 17:29   ` Pieter de Bie
2008-10-31 17:47 ` Pierre Habouzit
2008-10-31 18:41   ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-10-31 18:54     ` Pierre Habouzit
2008-10-31 19:57       ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-10-31 20:12         ` Pierre Habouzit
2008-10-31 20:05     ` Junio C Hamano
2008-10-31 21:58       ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-11-01 17:30     ` Pierre Habouzit
2008-11-01 18:44       ` Andreas Ericsson
2008-11-01 18:48         ` Pierre Habouzit
2008-11-01 20:29         ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-11-01 21:58           ` Andreas Ericsson
2008-11-02  1:50             ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-11-03 10:17               ` Andreas Ericsson
2008-11-02  1:56       ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-11-02  9:25         ` Pierre Habouzit
2008-10-31 20:24   ` Nicolas Pitre
2008-10-31 20:29     ` david
2008-10-31 20:56       ` Nicolas Pitre
2008-10-31 21:43         ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-10-31 21:50           ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-10-31 21:51           ` Pierre Habouzit
2008-10-31 21:31     ` Pierre Habouzit
2008-10-31 22:10       ` Nicolas Pitre
2008-11-01 10:52         ` Andreas Ericsson
2008-10-31 23:24       ` Pieter de Bie
2008-10-31 23:28         ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-10-31 23:49           ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-01  0:02             ` Pierre Habouzit
2008-11-01  0:19               ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-11-01  1:02                 ` Pierre Habouzit
2008-11-01  0:13             ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-11-01  1:15               ` Nicolas Pitre
2008-11-01  1:19                 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-11-01  1:45                   ` Nicolas Pitre
2008-11-01  1:52                     ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-11-01  2:26                       ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-11-01 11:01                         ` Pierre Habouzit
2008-11-01 13:50                           ` Nicolas Pitre
2008-11-01 17:01                             ` Pierre Habouzit
2008-11-01 20:26                             ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-10-31 23:14     ` Junio C Hamano
2008-10-31 23:33       ` Pierre Habouzit
2008-10-31 23:41       ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-10-31 23:56         ` Jakub Narebski
2008-11-01  0:41         ` david
2008-11-01  1:00           ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-11-01  1:04             ` david
2008-11-01  1:08               ` Pierre Habouzit
2008-11-01  1:33                 ` Nicolas Pitre
2008-11-01  1:38                   ` Pierre Habouzit
2008-11-01  1:49                     ` Nicolas Pitre
2008-11-01  1:43                   ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-11-01  1:53                     ` Nicolas Pitre
2008-11-01 22:57                       ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-11-02  0:26                         ` Scott Chacon
2008-11-02  1:07                           ` Scott Chacon [this message]
2008-11-02  1:36                             ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-11-02  5:09                             ` David Brown
2008-11-03 16:20                               ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-11-01  1:06           ` Pierre Habouzit
2008-11-01  1:36             ` david
2008-10-31 20:24   ` Brian Gernhardt
2008-10-31 21:59   ` Andreas Ericsson
2008-10-31 22:01     ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-10-31 22:51       ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-01 11:17       ` Andreas Ericsson
2008-10-31 23:22     ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-10-31 23:18 ` Bruno Santos
2008-10-31 23:25   ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-11-01 19:18 ` Andreas Ericsson
2008-11-01 20:42   ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-11-02  2:30     ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-11-02  9:19     ` Pierre Habouzit
2008-11-03 13:08     ` Andreas Ericsson
2008-11-08 13:26 ` Steve Frécinaux
2008-11-08 14:35   ` Andreas Ericsson
2008-11-08 17:27     ` Pierre Habouzit
2008-11-09 10:17       ` Andreas Ericsson
2008-11-09 21:02         ` Shawn O. Pearce

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d411cc4a0811011807g229f8becs9f411d6e19fb6c12@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=schacon@gmail.com \
    --cc=david@lang.hm \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=madcoder@debian.org \
    --cc=nico@cam.org \
    --cc=spearce@spearce.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).