From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FD5D1F404 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 16:55:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728807AbeIJVum (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Sep 2018 17:50:42 -0400 Received: from siwi.pair.com ([209.68.5.199]:10327 "EHLO siwi.pair.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728347AbeIJVum (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Sep 2018 17:50:42 -0400 Received: from siwi.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by siwi.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 109163F4012; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 12:55:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [10.160.98.162] (unknown [167.220.148.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by siwi.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CFE0E3F4000; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 12:55:42 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mingw: fix mingw_open_append to work with named pipes To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Johannes Sixt , Jeff Hostetler , git@vger.kernel.org References: <1c524f56-2021-a961-168f-e5c6d7914ec2@kdbg.org> <0d38ec8e-3f4b-c0fb-ba6f-e2cef39e4db4@jeffhostetler.com> From: Jeff Hostetler Message-ID: Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 12:55:42 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On 9/10/2018 12:42 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jeff Hostetler writes: > >> Yeah, this whole thing is a little under-documented for my tastes. >> Let's leave it as you have it. I'll re-roll with a fix to route >> named pipes to the existing _wopen() code. > > OK, I have these two patches in 'next', but let's postpone it for > now. Windows port will be built with extra topics over what we have > a the release anyway, so your improved version may become part of > that and then can come back to benefit us in the next cycle ;-) > > Thanks. > That's fine. This can easily wait until after 2.19.0. Thanks Jeff