From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fout8-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout8-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0763513C838 for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:31:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.151 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713353504; cv=none; b=dAmIjUk2cpZ+MdrmDFleXPhkOnNVTKkQdsMaaKJ7jfipqa4ZCGsTYEYsybMepoLv+y1P/gk/JSOoSAjnIuSH3wOAU64zsNX+SmBOImou+Gg3KeWB+AqvVlpN92dQUjvd3+UTLM5CFRzmKE8gl0dkhHEFLxSV6V7VRMtfr6AlCFc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713353504; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5V4xYChaEkLcCJCPxbS2lg3a5lURbq1RXJv6LebfWuU=; h=MIME-Version:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From:To:Cc: Subject:Content-Type; b=K/F31YRD3wP62hWZP4h0ur6esgXi7JrHs1tgoeOIH0aJRyKolC5aiJHTk0CZnubcXOOBsq6ROFXi0ggUmcWz2jrW+6f1j3a1s8X66Kapi7txCbLYkv529TK8qXvth5yQCn6YNWk2f9aPX0LuzGMrPClpkvoda4tbyf7I0l5DmCs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=khaugsbakk.name; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=khaugsbakk.name; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=khaugsbakk.name header.i=@khaugsbakk.name header.b=Na3AyvQx; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=Cm6VzQ8o; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.151 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=khaugsbakk.name Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=khaugsbakk.name Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=khaugsbakk.name header.i=@khaugsbakk.name header.b="Na3AyvQx"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="Cm6VzQ8o" Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailfout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E410138010B; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 07:31:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap49 ([10.202.2.99]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 17 Apr 2024 07:31:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=khaugsbakk.name; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type :date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1713353501; x=1713439901; bh=WQjFnW+btVJAn7T6Oq3dxp5nDnvZ5MuT cBOftHu1Evo=; b=Na3AyvQxe7Bqb5T03UAeQpaeVyi6G/tNRTb3Lw4+cLPL2azz lrWEcOMhCsBAfbOh9HUGgPTp1a1IVITjPyweDwcs4ebsQ21ZHwim5GOzafqXgDMN HCNYhDPVg8WKMRHetmWUBHGvnTUU0dar5Q7B6iPe/CPcaiTuLfBrKPOEH4zQpaOX NT9k9vMxaJI0//zW2YSfbPIncT6JGG1ABouzjXeqQv8JEkxdyQ3WQXUFyJRuphaO 2NH3W9S6qBsepIAd5IqfoE7tH9QdDGPqLXV8hWwuC1MNWnKyAAMJ9gveh23A2qrC DeFDvlFkweb3CF9Uwhos5tepu0vogcI8PzKBVQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1713353501; x= 1713439901; bh=WQjFnW+btVJAn7T6Oq3dxp5nDnvZ5MuTcBOftHu1Evo=; b=C m6VzQ8osI7B43O4hEYJRigP6K/M3sGFWANq6P/yA16JQGM8eewj73Vl0jVV6JlCH WMLxoYIS3IPnDgOJ0EbNb/KCX2sglV0tu1z516zJzBB6KmHH9Yk+V8A4B27XHAqd L0BgRz8iLhqtWlWmPxKm/Pp15AYBaaZM80LhajgVyihWeGYDwNSERxN9zKKqN6l1 wcGeDJgu65vWLOVlV3q69t6DENVQA5pu388bQdY23BPm3D6kx3aAfYAZoE1uYJSO 1+hkvAQQEBiuKje7aZN8JKnjlhksJLcOf42CAf/tIpJ3RooxmCzs3UV18mPRYSGZ e1OOCQVGLsqx/B29z5NlA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrudejkedggedtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvfevufgtgfesthhqredtreerjeenucfhrhhomhepfdfm rhhishhtohhffhgvrhcujfgruhhgshgsrghkkhdfuceotghouggvsehkhhgruhhgshgsrg hkkhdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedtkeduvedthfelueevheffhedvveei ueeiheehudehveegueetteduuddtfeelueenucffohhmrghinhepkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorh hgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheptgho uggvsehkhhgruhhgshgsrghkkhdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i2671468f:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 4D46315A0092; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 07:31:40 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.11.0-alpha0-379-gabd37849b7-fm-20240408.001-gabd37849 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <1f31004bd8445e1e4717817638d5509a@manjaro.org> References: <1d9c6ce3df714211889453c245485d46b43edff6.1713324598.git.dsimic@manjaro.org> <154b085c-3e92-4eb6-b6a6-97aa02f8f07d@gmail.com> <1f31004bd8445e1e4717817638d5509a@manjaro.org> Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 13:31:19 +0200 From: "Kristoffer Haugsbakk" To: "Dragan Simic" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Phillip Wood" , "Eric Sunshine" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] format-patch: new --resend option for adding "RESEND" to patch subjects Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 17, 2024, at 12:52, Dragan Simic wrote: > Hello Phillip, > > On 2024-04-17 12:02, Phillip Wood wrote: >> On 17/04/2024 04:32, Dragan Simic wrote: >>> Add --resend as the new command-line option for "git format-patch" >>> that adds >>> "RESEND" as a (sub)suffix to the patch subject prefix, eventually >>> producing >>> "[PATCH RESEND]" as the default patch subject prefix. >>> >>> "[PATCH RESEND]" is a patch subject prefix commonly used on mailing >>> lists >>> for patches resent to a mailing list after they had attracted no >>> attention >>> for some time, usually for a couple of weeks. As such, this subject >>> prefix >>> deserves adding --resend as a new shorthand option to "git >>> format-patch". >> >> Playing devil's advocate for a minute, is this really common enough to >> justify a new option when the user can use "--subject-prefix=3D'PATCH >> RESEND'" instead? > > Based on my experience, "[PATCH RESEND]" is roughly as commonly > used as "[PATCH RFC]". In other words, it obviously isn't used > as much as the good, old plain "[PATCH]", but it is used. The format-patch generated string is `RFC PATCH`. The number of emails with `PATCH RESEND` for this list:[1] ``` $ git log --oneline --fixed-strings --grep=3D'[PATCH RESEND' | wc -l 28 ``` For RFC: ``` $ git log --oneline --fixed-strings --grep=3D'[RFC PATCH' | wc -l 1181 ``` =E2=80=A0 1: According to http://lore.kernel.org/git/1 --=20 Kristoffer Haugsbakk