From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Danjel McGougan Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix ptrdiff_t vs. int Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 15:51:58 +0200 Message-ID: References: <42971EB4.2050403@oberhumer.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri May 27 16:18:54 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dbfcy-0003Kr-MT for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 27 May 2005 16:15:56 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261745AbVE0ORe (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 May 2005 10:17:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261751AbVE0ORe (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 May 2005 10:17:34 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:7112 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261745AbVE0ORX (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 May 2005 10:17:23 -0400 Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DbfXP-0002Eq-1X for git@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 27 May 2005 16:10:11 +0200 Received: from c83-250-33-218.bredband.comhem.se ([83.250.33.218]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 27 May 2005 16:10:11 +0200 Received: from danjel.mcgougan by c83-250-33-218.bredband.comhem.se with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 27 May 2005 16:10:11 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: git@vger.kernel.org X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c83-250-33-218.bredband.comhem.se User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <42971EB4.2050403@oberhumer.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer wrote: > This trivial patch fixes an obvious ptrdiff_t vs. int mismatch. Which > makes we wonder why Linus isn't hitting this on his ppc64 - maybe it's > time to start using -Werror... > I think the PPC calling convention is to use registers for the first few parameters, so the bug probably will not surface on PPC64. /Danjel