From: "Mathieu Liénard--Mayor" <mathieu.lienard--mayor@ensimag.fr>
To: Antoine Pelisse <apelisse@gmail.com>
Cc: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>,
"Célestin Matte" <celestin.matte@ensimag.fr>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Git Users" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Jorge-Juan.Garcia-Garcia@ensimag.imag.fr,
"Matthieu Moy" <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
Subject: Re: New feature discussion: git rebase --status
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 14:19:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dc115f90be3bc5830473a6648bf37df5@ensibm.imag.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALWbr2x-4_QSurvScYL+2Utn=-K3Knb7Kif9SAvV_V-ZdvPfCw@mail.gmail.com>
Le 2013-06-13 07:52, Antoine Pelisse a écrit :
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 12:19 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
> wrote:
>> Antoine Pelisse <apelisse@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> Maybe we can display previous and next commits to provide some
>>> context. Like we do for diff.
>>> For example:
>>>
>>> $ git status
>>> # HEAD detached from ecb9f3e
>>> # Already applied 330 patches (displaying next 3):
>>> # b170635... my_commit_message
>>> # b170635... my_commit_message
>>> # b170635... my_commit_message
>>> # Already applied 119 (displaying last 3)
>>> # b170635... my_commit_message
>>> # b170635... my_commit_message
>>> # b170635... my_commit_message
>>
>> I think you meant one of them to be
>>
>> # Still to be applied 119 (showing the first 3)
>>
>> instead.
>
> Of course,
>
>> I am not sure if it is worth 8 lines, especially given
>> that "git log --oneline -$n" would give you "Already applied" part
>> that is beyond what will be shown in this message easily if you
>> wanted to. So it might be enough to show "The one that has last
>> been replayed" (aka "HEAD") and "The one you are in the middle of
>> replaying".
>
> That's very true. The piece of information that is hard to get is
> "what's left to be done".
>
> So something like this would make sense:
>
> $ git status
> # HEAD detached from ecb9f3e
> # You are currently editing a832578... my_commit_message [120/450]
> while rebasing.
> # 320 patches left to apply (showing next 3):
> # b170635... my_commit_message
> # b170635... my_commit_message
> # b170635... my_commit_message
> # (use "git commit --amend" to amend the current commit)
> # (use "git rebase --continue" once you are satisfied with your
> changes)
>
> So that's 4 extra lines compared to current output. But should we
> make
> it a default ?
Personally I believe we should not make it the default output.
Currently, the output I'm working on is the following:
$ git status
# HEAD detached from ecb9f3e
# You are currently editing a832578 while rebasing branch 'split-rm-v7'
on 'ecb9f3e'.
# (use "git commit --amend" to amend the current commit)
# (use "git rebase --continue" once you are satisfied with your
changes)
$ git status --rebase-todo
# HEAD detached from ecb9f3e
# You are currently editing a832578 while rebasing branch 'split-rm-v7'
on 'ecb9f3e'.
# Still 2 patches left to apply:
# e a832578 rm: better error message on failure for multiple files
# e fd0330b rm: introduce advice.rmHints to shorten messages
# (use "git commit --amend" to amend the current commit)
# (use "git rebase --continue" once you are satisfied with your
changes)
I'm still unsure about the name of the flag, I chose that one
accordingly
to .git/merge-rebase/rebase-todo
--
Mathieu Liénard--Mayor,
2nd year at Grenoble INP - ENSIMAG
(+33)6 80 56 30 02
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-13 12:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-11 12:35 New feature discussion: git rebase --status Mathieu Liénard--Mayor
2013-06-11 12:40 ` Thomas Rast
2013-06-11 12:55 ` John Keeping
2013-06-11 13:19 ` Matthieu Moy
2013-06-11 17:18 ` Hilco Wijbenga
2013-06-11 17:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-06-12 10:17 ` Mathieu Liénard--Mayor
2013-06-12 11:12 ` Célestin Matte
2013-06-12 11:23 ` Mathieu Liénard--Mayor
2013-06-12 12:28 ` Antoine Pelisse
[not found] ` <CAH_OBifOeSSWB-LPT=Zv2AGEf5+nTh7yxE-1ijD0snFp3RS8Dw@mail.gmail.com>
2013-06-12 12:50 ` Mathieu Liénard--Mayor
2013-06-12 22:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-06-13 5:52 ` Antoine Pelisse
2013-06-13 12:19 ` Mathieu Liénard--Mayor [this message]
2013-06-12 12:41 ` Matthieu Moy
2013-06-12 12:52 ` John Keeping
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dc115f90be3bc5830473a6648bf37df5@ensibm.imag.fr \
--to=mathieu.lienard--mayor@ensimag.fr \
--cc=Jorge-Juan.Garcia-Garcia@ensimag.imag.fr \
--cc=Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr \
--cc=apelisse@gmail.com \
--cc=celestin.matte@ensimag.fr \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).