Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>,
	Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] archive-tar: guard get_path_prefix against zero-length input
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 06:09:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dcd319476add64e892e517faa71966f09010029a.1791958171.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.2253.git.1791958171.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>

From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>

The `get_path_prefix()` function uses a `do ... while()` loop that
unconditionally decrements the `size_t` index variable before checking
the loop condition. When that variable is 0 on entry, the decrement
wraps to `SIZE_MAX`, and `path[SIZE_MAX]` is an out-of-bounds read.

The current caller (`write_tar_entry()`) only invokes this function when
`pathlen > sizeof(header.name)` i.e. when `pathlen` is at least 100.
Therefore, the bug is unreachable in practice.

However, the function's interface accepts arbitrary pathlen and maxlen
values, and a future caller or a maxlen of 0 could trigger the wrap, so
let's add a check for that.

Pointed out by Coverity.

Assisted-by: Claude Opus 4.6
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
---
 archive-tar.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/archive-tar.c b/archive-tar.c
index a1c66024d4..2da6e55484 100644
--- a/archive-tar.c
+++ b/archive-tar.c
@@ -210,6 +210,8 @@ static size_t get_path_prefix(const char *path, size_t pathlen, size_t maxlen)
 		i--;
 	if (i > maxlen)
 		i = maxlen;
+	if (!i)
+		return 0;
 	do {
 		i--;
 	} while (i > 0 && path[i] != '/');
-- 
gitgitgadget


  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-14  6:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-14  6:09 [PATCH 0/5] Address overflows pointed out by Coverity Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2026-10-14  6:09 ` Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget [this message]
2026-10-14  6:09 ` [PATCH 2/5] http: use `size_t` for byte position in fwrite_sha1_file Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2026-10-14  6:09 ` [PATCH 3/5] wrapper: reject insanely large byte counts when reading/writing Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2026-10-14  6:09 ` [PATCH 4/5] git-compat-util: add `signed_mult_overflows` and `mult_overflows` macros Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2026-10-14  6:09 ` [PATCH 5/5] date: avoid overflow in approxidate relative-time multiplication Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dcd319476add64e892e517faa71966f09010029a.1791958171.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --to=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox