From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: walt Subject: Re: Does git belong in root's $PATH? Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 17:22:12 -0800 Organization: none Message-ID: References: <43C0025A.9080406@op5.se> <43C02725.2020702@zytor.com> <43C05ED5.1090603@op5.se> <43C05F4C.8050908@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jan 08 02:22:32 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EvPGN-0007G4-Ll for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 02:22:28 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161123AbWAHBWZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jan 2006 20:22:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161125AbWAHBWY (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jan 2006 20:22:24 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:47566 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161123AbWAHBWY (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jan 2006 20:22:24 -0500 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EvPGI-0007Fi-Na for git@vger.kernel.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 02:22:22 +0100 Received: from adsl-69-234-210-171.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net ([69.234.210.171]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 02:22:22 +0100 Received: from wa1ter by adsl-69-234-210-171.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 02:22:22 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: git@vger.kernel.org X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-69-234-210-171.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051025) In-Reply-To: <43C05F4C.8050908@zytor.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: H. Peter Anvin wrote: > /usr used to be what is now called /home. What you're describing above > is the current usage. History lessons are valuable for us youngsters ;o) Can you give us a brief description of what motivated such a change? (Just as important, of course, is whether the original motives have changed or disappeared.) Thanks!