From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: walt Subject: Re: [PATCH] glossary: explain "master" and "origin" Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:33:12 -0800 Organization: none Message-ID: References: <20060110213645.GF13450@fieldses.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jan 11 00:33:43 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EwSze-0003dl-MD for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 00:33:36 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932705AbWAJXdc (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:33:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932707AbWAJXdc (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:33:32 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:51398 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932705AbWAJXdb (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:33:31 -0500 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EwSzR-0003bE-DR for git@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 00:33:21 +0100 Received: from adsl-69-234-210-171.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net ([69.234.210.171]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 00:33:21 +0100 Received: from wa1ter by adsl-69-234-210-171.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 00:33:21 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: git@vger.kernel.org X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-69-234-210-171.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net User-Agent: Mail/News 1.6a1 (X11/20060110) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: walt wrote: > J. Bruce Fields wrote: > [...] >> Most projects have one upstream >> project which they track. This is is the branch used for >> tracking that project... > > s/This/'origin'/ > > Lordy, I think many of the world's problems could be solved just > by forbidding the use of pronouns entirely! Now that I've had another beer, it occurs to me that a 'pronoun' is nothing more or less than a 'pointer' to a noun. Well! We all know that pointers are a major source of bugs in C code. Is it possible that lint could be taught to detect ambiguous pronouns in everyday speech?