From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: walt Subject: Re: cg-update bug? Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 07:03:59 -0800 Organization: none Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jan 21 16:06:08 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F0KJR-0001j3-M1 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:05:58 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932158AbWAUPEY (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jan 2006 10:04:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932142AbWAUPEY (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jan 2006 10:04:24 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:22984 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932158AbWAUPEX (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jan 2006 10:04:23 -0500 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1F0KHe-0001Iu-Qa for git@vger.kernel.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:04:09 +0100 Received: from adsl-69-234-176-54.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net ([69.234.176.54]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:04:06 +0100 Received: from wa1ter by adsl-69-234-176-54.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:04:06 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: git@vger.kernel.org X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-69-234-176-54.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net User-Agent: Mail/News 1.6a1 (X11/20060121) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: walt wrote: > ...there is no -v flag for cg-update. Could it be added > so I can get the old behavior back? Thanks for adding the flag, Petr. I tried it on git and the kernel this morning, and in each case cg-update -v printed the name of only one file. From looking at the logs I'm pretty sure there were multiple files updated, not just one. Does it print all filenames for you?