From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: walt Subject: Re: cg-update bug? Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 13:59:29 -0800 Organization: none Message-ID: References: <20060121203519.GN28365@pasky.or.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jan 21 22:59:51 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F0Qlu-0007H8-SE for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 22:59:47 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932376AbWAUV7o (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:59:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932399AbWAUV7o (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:59:44 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:5584 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932376AbWAUV7n (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:59:43 -0500 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1F0Qlq-0007Gc-Bc for git@vger.kernel.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 22:59:42 +0100 Received: from adsl-69-234-188-194.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net ([69.234.188.194]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 22:59:42 +0100 Received: from wa1ter by adsl-69-234-188-194.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 22:59:42 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: git@vger.kernel.org X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-69-234-188-194.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net User-Agent: Mail/News 1.6a1 (X11/20060121) In-Reply-To: <20060121203519.GN28365@pasky.or.cz> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Petr Baudis wrote: > Dear diary, on Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 04:03:59PM CET, I got a letter > where walt said that... >> Thanks for adding the flag, Petr. I tried it on git and >> the kernel this morning, and in each case cg-update -v >> printed the name of only one file. From looking at the >> logs I'm pretty sure there were multiple files updated, >> not just one. Does it print all filenames for you? > It prints all the filenames for me, but only the fetched ones. If you > fetched without merge earlier, it will list only the newly fetched > stuff. That is rather confusing, so now I added also cg-merge -v and > cg-update will pass its -v to cg-merge instead of cg-fetch. Well, I was anxious to try your new changes so I did cg-update on your cogito repository and I saw *six* updated files print out. I guess that both git and the kernel really did have only *one* updated file this morning, after all. A really bizarre coincidence! Thanks again for the update, and I hope your exam went well :o)