From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David Neu" Subject: Converting from svn to git Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 09:11:43 -0400 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Aug 10 15:12:48 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KSAj0-0004d8-BH for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 10 Aug 2008 15:12:46 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753676AbYHJNLo (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Aug 2008 09:11:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753829AbYHJNLo (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Aug 2008 09:11:44 -0400 Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.229]:44994 "EHLO wx-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753630AbYHJNLo (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Aug 2008 09:11:44 -0400 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h29so965578wxd.4 for ; Sun, 10 Aug 2008 06:11:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.25.1 with SMTP id 1mr7303142wxy.75.1218373903232; Sun, 10 Aug 2008 06:11:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.53.6 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Aug 2008 06:11:43 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, I'm trying to move an svn repo to git. I'm not going to be committing back to the svn repo, but will simply retire it and use git. The issue I'm having is that the svn repo has sub directories that I'd like to be separate git repos. I can easily accomplish this for the sub directories like this: git-svn clone svn-url/subdir1 git-svn clone svn-url/subdir2 etc. but for the files in the base directory git-svn clone svn-url pulls the entire directory tree. Is there a git-svn strategy similar to git-svnimport -P that would do the trick? My git version 1.5.6.4 doesn't include git-svnimport, and I'm getting the impression it's be deprecated. Many thanks for any help! Cheers, David