From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Narebski Subject: Re: Rebase semantic and cherry-pick Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 03:59:16 +0200 Organization: At home Message-ID: References: <1143596622.2481.10.camel@mattlaptop.metaesthetics.net> <7vlkutc36w.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Mar 30 03:59:28 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FOmRa-0008NS-Jz for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 03:59:27 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751432AbWC3B7Y (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Mar 2006 20:59:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751430AbWC3B7X (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Mar 2006 20:59:23 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:29090 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751432AbWC3B7X (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Mar 2006 20:59:23 -0500 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1FOmRS-0008Ls-5K for git@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 03:59:18 +0200 Received: from 193.0.122.19 ([193.0.122.19]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 03:59:18 +0200 Received: from jnareb by 193.0.122.19 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 03:59:18 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: git@vger.kernel.org X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.0.122.19 Mail-Copies-To: jnareb@gmail.com User-Agent: KNode/0.7.7 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Linus Torvalds wrote: > In contrast, here's an alternate workflow that is much easier to explain, > and doesn't involve "rebase" at all: > > git checkout his > git cherry-pick origin..mine [...] > Now, "git cherry-pick" doesn't actually support the above format, and I'm > not saying that the "git rebase" name itself is evil. I think we could fix > "git rebase" to work better, but the semantics - the way they are > _designed_ right now - are just horrible. Perhaps if possible also have git cherry-pick --whole-branch branchname meaning git cherry-pick branchname:begining..branchname:HEAD -- Jakub Narebski