From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Narebski Subject: Re: How to create independent branches Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2006 20:28:58 +0200 Organization: At home Message-ID: References: <20060407184701.GA6686@xp.machine.de> <7vr749i48s.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20060408180244.GA4807@xp.machine.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Apr 08 20:29:28 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FSIBb-0000ca-2c for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2006 20:29:27 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751417AbWDHS3H (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Apr 2006 14:29:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751419AbWDHS3H (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Apr 2006 14:29:07 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:52971 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751417AbWDHS3G (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Apr 2006 14:29:06 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1FSIB6-0000Wv-5P for git@vger.kernel.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2006 20:28:56 +0200 Received: from 193.0.122.19 ([193.0.122.19]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 08 Apr 2006 20:28:56 +0200 Received: from jnareb by 193.0.122.19 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 08 Apr 2006 20:28:56 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: git@vger.kernel.org X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.0.122.19 Mail-Copies-To: jnareb@gmail.com User-Agent: KNode/0.7.7 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Peter Baumann wrote: > Another question. I'd like to create a totaly independent branch (like > the "todo" branch in git). Is there a more user friendly way than doing > > git-checkout -b todo > rm .git/refs/heads/todo > rm .git/index > rm > > ... hack hack hack ... > git-commit -a Wouldn't it be better and more natural to go back to first commit, or even empty repository state at the beginning, and branch there? Or make separate repository? -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland