git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David Tweed" <david.tweed@gmail.com>
To: "Jordan Miller" <jmil@rice.edu>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: using git for file management while writing a thesis...
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 08:17:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e1dab3980804050017s16d144fbp7f0a6c6d4206f50d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56810483-5257-49CD-AA0E-303DB6C4CEFB@rice.edu>

On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Jordan Miller <jmil@rice.edu> wrote:
>  I am using git 1.5.3.1 on OS X 10.5.2 for file versioning for LaTeX files
[snip]
>  Everything works beautifully and incredibly speedily on my external 3.5"
> hard drive connected via Firewire.
>  On my USB keys, a huge number of changes are seen and git takes a very long
> time assessing ("deltifying") what are the changes needed (more than 10
> times the number of files are deltified!). Shouldn't git just realize that
> it only needs to make the changes that were made in the last commit, or am
>  Finally, I have also tried changing the disk formatting of the USB key to
> try to diagnose the problem. However, the problem is the same whether the
> format of the USB key is HFS+ Journaled or MS-DOS FAT32.
>
>  So, my question is what am I doing wrong with "git pull" and is there a
> better way to use git for the task at hand? Unfortunately, I have not yet
> been able to find a solution anywhere on the interwebnetblagosphere.

Not really directly relevant, but since no-one has replied: I daily
copy several revisions onto (git push) and back from (git pull) to USB
key (MS-DOS) on x86-Linux and it never takes more than a couple of
seconds. (Repo is around 17MB packed, maybe 10-400 objects updated per
push.) I know nothing about OS X, but the discrepancy between firewire
and usb suggests some performance issue in usb handling. I don't know
off the top of my head if packs on the receiveing end of a push are
mmap()'d (to find branch heads?), but OS X is said to have poor mmap
performance: maybe it interacts with usb driver to be even worse?

Anyway, only suggestion I've got is if you've got easy access to a
Linux machine with git available, try pushing from that and see if the
speed differs.

There have been reports of people using git when writing books, and I
use git to track papers I'm writing (amongst other things), so your
usage pattern is entirely normal.

HTH,
-- 
cheers, dave tweed__________________________
david.tweed@gmail.com
Rm 124, School of Systems Engineering, University of Reading.
"while having code so boring anyone can maintain it, use Python." --
attempted insult seen on slashdot

      reply	other threads:[~2008-04-05  7:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-03 20:58 using git for file management while writing a thesis Jordan Miller
2008-04-05  7:17 ` David Tweed [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e1dab3980804050017s16d144fbp7f0a6c6d4206f50d@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=david.tweed@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jmil@rice.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).