From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Mike Ralphson" Subject: Re: [announce] gc Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:06:24 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20081222212407.47c9ab1e.stephen@exigencecorp.com> <20081223082207.f31ab2a3.stephen@exigencecorp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Matthieu Moy" , git@vger.kernel.org To: "Stephen Haberman" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Dec 23 16:08:05 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LF8rK-0001S6-2p for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:07:46 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751446AbYLWPG1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2008 10:06:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751361AbYLWPG1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2008 10:06:27 -0500 Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.92.25]:55810 "EHLO qw-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751279AbYLWPG0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2008 10:06:26 -0500 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 3so1623796qwe.37 for ; Tue, 23 Dec 2008 07:06:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=2cHzBw2hYL1MGMen9Im22EqpiOPABfwkUdlQH9f4eWg=; b=ULpptCAoA8pXuJtL9jF++Pm11n5ogd4yE32Xs80hlq9WVD7RzN3jyT8o8oTu2oik5E eCnJMZA7pNJ0e4FEA4pIi2rrZOGTFhvFR/JIUr0rjY1ShE9rdRCrksu3DBu+qjy/LlBZ wGkRM6/vBGc0HOT8hbqXs0Meic1OR1odXWIQA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=EWLb/95uMgiVOy1E3cD0cQwI2bvRKjbvsKSVSi4BavxGHmoJjs7tt+4odRB36bBURL Tpc6GBlHTrFW/T6cJsHsNRgaxlf0cRiMpvya6oaFBowlvo3n+xWIE0A3uPmXyuclYlOd q28zXWlFEttA2d+k8XdhYlA+qwWKKIuPoHjus= Received: by 10.214.130.2 with SMTP id c2mr1278792qad.159.1230044784939; Tue, 23 Dec 2008 07:06:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.214.150.9 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Dec 2008 07:06:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20081223082207.f31ab2a3.stephen@exigencecorp.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: 2008/12/23 Stephen Haberman > > > You should find a better name. I mean, one for which > > > > http://www.google.com/search?q=git+YOUR-NAME-HERE > > > > has a chance to find you ... > > Ah, good point. > > Perhaps "git corporate hooks" or "git enterprise hooks". > > I'm a little cautious about using words like corporate/enterprise as > there is nothing exclusively "corporate/enterprise" about any of the > hooks in the project, we just happened to be on a corporate/enterprise > project when we came up with them. As the workflows these seem to support are centralised (as you say these apply equally well in some non-corporate / enterprise projects), how about git-central? Mike