* [PATCH] Alter git-rebase command line options. [not found] <20060426075118.65876315.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> @ 2006-04-26 11:51 ` sean 2006-04-26 12:30 ` Jakub Narebski 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: sean @ 2006-04-26 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: git git rebase [--branch <branch>] <newbase> git rebase --continue git rebase --abort Add "--continue" to restart the rebase process after manually resolving conflicts. The user is warned if there are still differences between the index and the working files. Add "--abort" to restore the original branch, and remove the .dotest working files. Change the order that branch and newbase are specified as per comments from Linus. Also remove the need to specify both an upstream branch _and_ a new merge base. The documentation is updated to reflect this new command line format but the script still quietly supports the existing command line options completely. This fixes a minor bug in the current version where: "git rebase master^ master" doesn't notice that there is no need to perform the rebase. --- Documentation/git-rebase.txt | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------- git-rebase.sh | 133 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 2 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-) d8366d9de1aecf3143af646f49e7f7bc0f924ae6 diff --git a/Documentation/git-rebase.txt b/Documentation/git-rebase.txt index 4a7e67a..f1e83ea 100644 --- a/Documentation/git-rebase.txt +++ b/Documentation/git-rebase.txt @@ -3,76 +3,121 @@ git-rebase(1) NAME ---- -git-rebase - Rebase local commits to new upstream head +git-rebase - Rebase local commits to a new upstream head SYNOPSIS -------- -'git-rebase' [--onto <newbase>] <upstream> [<branch>] +'git-rebase' [--branch <branch>] <newbase> + +'git-rebase' --continue + +'git-rebase' --abort DESCRIPTION ----------- -git-rebase applies to <upstream> (or optionally to <newbase>) commits -from <branch> that do not appear in <upstream>. When <branch> is not -specified it defaults to the current branch (HEAD). +git-rebase replaces <branch> with a new branch of the same name having +a HEAD of <newbase>. It then attempts to make a new commit for each +commit from the original <branch> that does not yet exist in this new +<branch>. + +It is possible that a merge failure will prevent this process from being +completely automatic. You will have to resolve any such merge failure +and run `git rebase --continue`. If you can not resolve the merge +failure, running `git rebase --abort` will restore the original <branch> +and remove the working files found in the .dotest directory. -When git-rebase is complete, <branch> will be updated to point to the -newly created line of commit objects, so the previous line will not be -accessible unless there are other references to it already. +Note that if <branch> is not specified on the command line, the currently +checked out branch is used. Assume the following history exists and the current branch is "topic": +------------ A---B---C topic / D---E---F---G master +------------ + +From this point, the result of running the following command: + -From this point, the result of either of the following commands: + git rebase --branch topic master - git-rebase master - git-rebase master topic would be: +------------ A'--B'--C' topic / D---E---F---G master +------------ While, starting from the same point, the result of either of the following commands: - git-rebase --onto master~1 master - git-rebase --onto master~1 master topic + git rebase master~1 + git rebase --branch topic master~1 + would be: +------------ A'--B'--C' topic / D---E---F---G master +------------ In case of conflict, git-rebase will stop at the first problematic commit -and leave conflict markers in the tree. After resolving the conflict manually -and updating the index with the desired resolution, you can continue the -rebasing process with +and leave conflict markers in the tree. You can use git diff to locate +the markers (<<<<<<) and make edits to resolve the conflict. For each +file you edit, you need to tell git that the conflict has been resolved, +typically this would be done with + + + git update-index <filename> + + +After resolving the conflict manually and updating the index with the +desired resolution, you can continue the rebasing process with + + + git rebase --continue - git am --resolved --3way Alternatively, you can undo the git-rebase with - git reset --hard ORIG_HEAD - rm -r .dotest + + git rebase --abort OPTIONS ------- <newbase>:: - Starting point at which to create the new commits. If the - --onto option is not specified, the starting point is - <upstream>. - -<upstream>:: - Upstream branch to compare against. + Starting point at which to create the new commits. <branch>:: Working branch; defaults to HEAD. +--continue:: + Restart the rebasing process after having resolved a merge conflict. + +--abort:: + Restore the original branch and abort the rebase operation. + +NOTES +----- +When you rebase a branch, you are changing its history in a way that +will cause problems for anyone who already has a copy of the branch +in their repository and tries to pull updates from you. You should +understand the implications of using 'git rebase' on a repository that +you share. + +When the git rebase command is run, it will first execute a "pre-rebase" +hook if one exists. You can use this hook to do sanity checks and +reject the rebase if it isn't appropriate. Please see the template +pre-rebase hook script for an example. + +You must be in the top directory of your project to start (or continue) +a rebase. Upon completion, <branch> will be the current branch. + Author ------ Written by Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> diff --git a/git-rebase.sh b/git-rebase.sh index 86dfe9c..5a4e33b 100755 --- a/git-rebase.sh +++ b/git-rebase.sh @@ -3,40 +3,61 @@ # # Copyright (c) 2005 Junio C Hamano. # -USAGE='[--onto <newbase>] <upstream> [<branch>]' -LONG_USAGE='git-rebase applies to <upstream> (or optionally to <newbase>) commits -from <branch> that do not appear in <upstream>. When <branch> is not -specified it defaults to the current branch (HEAD). - -When git-rebase is complete, <branch> will be updated to point to the -newly created line of commit objects, so the previous line will not be -accessible unless there are other references to it already. - -Assuming the following history: - - A---B---C topic - / - D---E---F---G master - -The result of the following command: - - git-rebase --onto master~1 master topic - - would be: - - A'\''--B'\''--C'\'' topic - / - D---E---F---G master +USAGE='[--branch <branch>] <newbase>' +LONG_USAGE='git-rebase replaces <branch> with a new one of the +same name having a HEAD of <newbase>. It then attempts to create +a new commit for each commit from the original <branch> that does +not yet exist on this new <branch>. + +It is possible that a merge failure will prevent this process +from being completely automatic. You will have to resolve any +such merge failure and run git-rebase --continue. If you can +not resolve the merge failure, running git-rebase --abort will +restore the original <branch> and remove the working files found +in the .dotest directory. + +Note that if <branch> is not specified on the command line, the +currently checked out branch is used. You must be in the top +directory of your project to start (or continue) a rebase. + +Example: git-rebase --branch topic master~1 + + A---B---C topic A'\''--B'\''--C'\'' topic + / --> / + D---E---F---G master D---E---F---G master ' . git-sh-setup unset newbase +unset branch_name while case "$#" in 0) break ;; esac do case "$1" in + --continue) + diff=$(git-diff-files) + case "$diff" in + ?*) echo "You must edit all merge conflicts and then" + echo "mark them as resolved using git update-index" + exit 1 + ;; + esac + git am --resolved --3way + exit + ;; + --abort) + [ -d .dotest ] || die "No rebase in progress?" + git reset --hard ORIG_HEAD + rm -r .dotest + exit + ;; + --branch) + test $# -ne 3 -o -n "$newbase" && usage + branch_name="$2" + shift + ;; --onto) - test 2 -le "$#" || usage + test $# -lt 2 -o -n "$branch_name" && usage newbase="$2" shift ;; @@ -49,6 +70,20 @@ do esac shift done +# Quietly support the historic command line [--onto newbase] newbase' [branch] +test $# -lt 1 && usage +test -z "$newbase" && newbase="$1" +shift +if [ -z "$branch_name" ]; then + if [ $# -gt 0 ]; then + branch_name="$1" + shift + else branch_name=`git symbolic-ref HEAD` || die "No current branch" + branch_name=`expr "z$branch_name" : 'zrefs/heads/\(.*\)'` + fi +fi +test $# -gt 0 && usage +git checkout "$branch_name" || usage # Make sure we do not have .dotest if mkdir .dotest @@ -72,11 +107,6 @@ case "$diff" in ;; esac -# The upstream head must be given. Make sure it is valid. -upstream_name="$1" -upstream=`git rev-parse --verify "${upstream_name}^0"` || - die "invalid upstream $upstream_name" - # If a hook exists, give it a chance to interrupt if test -x "$GIT_DIR/hooks/pre-rebase" then @@ -86,47 +116,22 @@ then } fi -# If the branch to rebase is given, first switch to it. -case "$#" in -2) - branch_name="$2" - git-checkout "$2" || usage - ;; -*) - branch_name=`git symbolic-ref HEAD` || die "No current branch" - branch_name=`expr "z$branch_name" : 'zrefs/heads/\(.*\)'` - ;; -esac -branch=$(git-rev-parse --verify "${branch_name}^0") || exit - # Make sure the branch to rebase onto is valid. -onto_name=${newbase-"$upstream_name"} -onto=$(git-rev-parse --verify "${onto_name}^0") || exit - -# Now we are rebasing commits $upstream..$branch on top of $onto +branch=$(git-rev-parse --verify "${branch_name}^0") || exit +onto=$(git-rev-parse --verify "${newbase}^0") || exit # Check if we are already based on $onto, but this should be # done only when upstream and onto are the same. -if test "$upstream" = "onto" -then - mb=$(git-merge-base "$onto" "$branch") - if test "$mb" = "$onto" - then - echo >&2 "Current branch $branch_name is up to date." - exit 0 - fi -fi - -# Rewind the head to "$onto"; this saves our current head in ORIG_HEAD. -git-reset --hard "$onto" - -# If the $onto is a proper descendant of the tip of the branch, then -# we just fast forwarded. +mb=$(git-merge-base "$onto" "$branch") if test "$mb" = "$onto" then - echo >&2 "Fast-forwarded $branch to $newbase." + echo >&2 "Current branch $branch_name already has $newbase as a base!" exit 0 fi -git-format-patch -k --stdout --full-index "$upstream" ORIG_HEAD | +# Rewind the head to "$onto"; this saves our current head in ORIG_HEAD. +git-reset --hard "$newbase" + +# Now we are rebasing commits $newbase..$branch on top of $newbase +git-format-patch -k --stdout --full-index "$newbase" ORIG_HEAD | git am --binary -3 -k -- 1.3.0.gd8366 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Alter git-rebase command line options. 2006-04-26 11:51 ` [PATCH] Alter git-rebase command line options sean @ 2006-04-26 12:30 ` Jakub Narebski [not found] ` <20060426090447.0053165c.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> [not found] ` <20060426104938.1ff14b2b.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> 0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Jakub Narebski @ 2006-04-26 12:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: git sean wrote: > git rebase [--branch <branch>] <newbase> > git rebase --continue > git rebase --abort > > Add "--continue" to restart the rebase process after > manually resolving conflicts. The user is warned if > there are still differences between the index and the > working files. > > Add "--abort" to restore the original branch, and > remove the .dotest working files. Very nice. > SYNOPSIS > -------- > -'git-rebase' [--onto <newbase>] <upstream> [<branch>] > +'git-rebase' [--branch <branch>] <newbase> > + > +'git-rebase' --continue > + > +'git-rebase' --abort > > DESCRIPTION > ----------- > -git-rebase applies to <upstream> (or optionally to <newbase>) commits > -from <branch> that do not appear in <upstream>. When <branch> is not > -specified it defaults to the current branch (HEAD). > +git-rebase replaces <branch> with a new branch of the same name having > +a HEAD of <newbase>. It then attempts to make a new commit for each > +commit from the original <branch> that does not yet exist in this new > +<branch>. What about 'git-rebase --onto <newbase> <upstream> <branch>' three options version? -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20060426090447.0053165c.seanlkml@sympatico.ca>]
* Re: [PATCH] Alter git-rebase command line options. [not found] ` <20060426090447.0053165c.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> @ 2006-04-26 13:04 ` sean 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: sean @ 2006-04-26 13:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jakub Narebski; +Cc: git On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 14:30:47 +0200 Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote: > > What about 'git-rebase --onto <newbase> <upstream> <branch>' three options > version? Ahh yes, I didn't look closely enough at that, and got fooled by a bug in the current version[1] into thinking it was never used anyway. Will have to respin, the script and come up with some docs. What's a reason someone would want or need to use this three option version ? Sean [1] Line 110: if test "$upstream" = "onto" ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20060426104938.1ff14b2b.seanlkml@sympatico.ca>]
* [PATCH] Add --continue and --abort options to git-rebase. [not found] ` <20060426104938.1ff14b2b.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> @ 2006-04-26 14:49 ` sean 2006-04-26 20:05 ` Junio C Hamano 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: sean @ 2006-04-26 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: git git rebase [--onto <newbase>] <upstream> [<branch>] git rebase --continue git rebase --abort Add "--continue" to restart the rebase process after manually resolving conflicts. The user is warned if there are still differences between the index and the working files. Add "--abort" to restore the original branch, and remove the .dotest working files. This fixes a minor bug in the current version where: "git rebase master^ master" doesn't notice that there is no need to perform the rebase. Some minor additions to the git-rebase documentation. --- Take 2. Must simpler patch which doesn't trying to rejigger the command line too much. Documentation/git-rebase.txt | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- git-rebase.sh | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------- 2 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) b009f7b17dce8f860f242f9cafc2aa510daf9f41 diff --git a/Documentation/git-rebase.txt b/Documentation/git-rebase.txt index 4a7e67a..cf74005 100644 --- a/Documentation/git-rebase.txt +++ b/Documentation/git-rebase.txt @@ -3,38 +3,54 @@ git-rebase(1) NAME ---- -git-rebase - Rebase local commits to new upstream head +git-rebase - Rebase local commits to a new head SYNOPSIS -------- 'git-rebase' [--onto <newbase>] <upstream> [<branch>] +'git-rebase' --continue + +'git-rebase' --abort + DESCRIPTION ----------- -git-rebase applies to <upstream> (or optionally to <newbase>) commits -from <branch> that do not appear in <upstream>. When <branch> is not -specified it defaults to the current branch (HEAD). +git-rebase replaces <branch> with a new branch of the same name. When +the --onto option is provided the new branch starts out with a HEAD equal +to <newbase>, otherwise it is equal to <upstream>. It then attempts to +create a new commit for each commit from the original <branch> that does +not exist in the <upstream> branch. -When git-rebase is complete, <branch> will be updated to point to the -newly created line of commit objects, so the previous line will not be -accessible unless there are other references to it already. +It is possible that a merge failure will prevent this process from being +completely automatic. You will have to resolve any such merge failure +and run `git rebase --continue`. If you can not resolve the merge +failure, running `git rebase --abort` will restore the original <branch> +and remove the working files found in the .dotest directory. + +Note that if <branch> is not specified on the command line, the currently +checked out branch is used. Assume the following history exists and the current branch is "topic": +------------ A---B---C topic / D---E---F---G master +------------ From this point, the result of either of the following commands: + git-rebase master git-rebase master topic would be: +------------ A'--B'--C' topic / D---E---F---G master +------------ While, starting from the same point, the result of either of the following commands: @@ -44,21 +60,33 @@ commands: would be: +------------ A'--B'--C' topic / D---E---F---G master +------------ In case of conflict, git-rebase will stop at the first problematic commit -and leave conflict markers in the tree. After resolving the conflict manually -and updating the index with the desired resolution, you can continue the -rebasing process with +and leave conflict markers in the tree. You can use git diff to locate +the markers (<<<<<<) and make edits to resolve the conflict. For each +file you edit, you need to tell git that the conflict has been resolved, +typically this would be done with + + + git update-index <filename> + + +After resolving the conflict manually and updating the index with the +desired resolution, you can continue the rebasing process with + + + git rebase --continue - git am --resolved --3way Alternatively, you can undo the git-rebase with - git reset --hard ORIG_HEAD - rm -r .dotest + + git rebase --abort OPTIONS ------- @@ -73,6 +101,28 @@ OPTIONS <branch>:: Working branch; defaults to HEAD. +--continue:: + Restart the rebasing process after having resolved a merge conflict. + +--abort:: + Restore the original branch and abort the rebase operation. + +NOTES +----- +When you rebase a branch, you are changing its history in a way that +will cause problems for anyone who already has a copy of the branch +in their repository and tries to pull updates from you. You should +understand the implications of using 'git rebase' on a repository that +you share. + +When the git rebase command is run, it will first execute a "pre-rebase" +hook if one exists. You can use this hook to do sanity checks and +reject the rebase if it isn't appropriate. Please see the template +pre-rebase hook script for an example. + +You must be in the top directory of your project to start (or continue) +a rebase. Upon completion, <branch> will be the current branch. + Author ------ Written by Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> diff --git a/git-rebase.sh b/git-rebase.sh index 86dfe9c..2085ebe 100755 --- a/git-rebase.sh +++ b/git-rebase.sh @@ -4,37 +4,51 @@ # Copyright (c) 2005 Junio C Hamano. # USAGE='[--onto <newbase>] <upstream> [<branch>]' -LONG_USAGE='git-rebase applies to <upstream> (or optionally to <newbase>) commits -from <branch> that do not appear in <upstream>. When <branch> is not -specified it defaults to the current branch (HEAD). - -When git-rebase is complete, <branch> will be updated to point to the -newly created line of commit objects, so the previous line will not be -accessible unless there are other references to it already. - -Assuming the following history: - - A---B---C topic - / - D---E---F---G master - -The result of the following command: - - git-rebase --onto master~1 master topic - - would be: - - A'\''--B'\''--C'\'' topic - / - D---E---F---G master +LONG_USAGE='git-rebase replaces <branch> with a new branch of the +same name. When the --onto option is provided the new branch starts +out with a HEAD equal to <newbase>, otherwise it is equal to <upstream> +It then attempts to create a new commit for each commit from the original +<branch> that does not exist in the <upstream> branch. + +It is possible that a merge failure will prevent this process from being +completely automatic. You will have to resolve any such merge failure +and run git-rebase --continue. If you can not resolve the merge failure, +running git-rebase --abort will restore the original <branch> and remove +the working files found in the .dotest directory. + +Note that if <branch> is not specified on the command line, the +currently checked out branch is used. You must be in the top +directory of your project to start (or continue) a rebase. + +Example: git-rebase master~1 topic + + A---B---C topic A'\''--B'\''--C'\'' topic + / --> / + D---E---F---G master D---E---F---G master ' - . git-sh-setup unset newbase while case "$#" in 0) break ;; esac do case "$1" in + --continue) + diff=$(git-diff-files) + case "$diff" in + ?*) echo "You must edit all merge conflicts and then" + echo "mark them as resolved using git update-index" + exit 1 + ;; + esac + git am --resolved --3way + exit + ;; + --abort) + [ -d .dotest ] || die "No rebase in progress?" + git reset --hard ORIG_HEAD + rm -r .dotest + exit + ;; --onto) test 2 -le "$#" || usage newbase="$2" @@ -107,7 +121,7 @@ # Now we are rebasing commits $upstream. # Check if we are already based on $onto, but this should be # done only when upstream and onto are the same. -if test "$upstream" = "onto" +if test "$upstream" = "$onto" then mb=$(git-merge-base "$onto" "$branch") if test "$mb" = "$onto" -- 1.3.0.gb009 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Add --continue and --abort options to git-rebase. 2006-04-26 14:49 ` [PATCH] Add --continue and --abort options to git-rebase sean @ 2006-04-26 20:05 ` Junio C Hamano [not found] ` <20060427014237.6f7e5f8b.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Junio C Hamano @ 2006-04-26 20:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: sean; +Cc: git sean <seanlkml@sympatico.ca> writes: > git rebase [--onto <newbase>] <upstream> [<branch>] > git rebase --continue > git rebase --abort > > --- > > Take 2. Must simpler patch which doesn't trying to > rejigger the command line too much. This second round seems to make more sense. Sign-off? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20060427014237.6f7e5f8b.seanlkml@sympatico.ca>]
* Re: [PATCH] Add --continue and --abort options to git-rebase. [not found] ` <20060427014237.6f7e5f8b.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> @ 2006-04-27 5:42 ` sean 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: sean @ 2006-04-27 5:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: git On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 13:05:28 -0700 Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> wrote: > sean <seanlkml@sympatico.ca> writes: > > > git rebase [--onto <newbase>] <upstream> [<branch>] > > git rebase --continue > > git rebase --abort > > > > --- > > > > Take 2. Must simpler patch which doesn't trying to > > rejigger the command line too much. > > This second round seems to make more sense. Sign-off? > Sure, Signed-off-by: Sean Estabrooks <seanlkml@sympatico.ca> Sean ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-04-27 5:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20060426075118.65876315.seanlkml@sympatico.ca>
2006-04-26 11:51 ` [PATCH] Alter git-rebase command line options sean
2006-04-26 12:30 ` Jakub Narebski
[not found] ` <20060426090447.0053165c.seanlkml@sympatico.ca>
2006-04-26 13:04 ` sean
[not found] ` <20060426104938.1ff14b2b.seanlkml@sympatico.ca>
2006-04-26 14:49 ` [PATCH] Add --continue and --abort options to git-rebase sean
2006-04-26 20:05 ` Junio C Hamano
[not found] ` <20060427014237.6f7e5f8b.seanlkml@sympatico.ca>
2006-04-27 5:42 ` sean
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).