From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Narebski Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/5] Implement 'prior' commit object links (and Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 06:44:06 +0200 Organization: At home Message-ID: References: <20060429165151.2570.qmail@science.horizon.com> <7viros1585.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vfyjuwt0v.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7v8xpmva9x.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <4455638A.3070802@vilain.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon May 01 06:43:43 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FaQG6-00082i-EJ for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 01 May 2006 06:43:42 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750746AbWEAEnb (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 May 2006 00:43:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750790AbWEAEnb (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 May 2006 00:43:31 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:2798 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750746AbWEAEnb (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 May 2006 00:43:31 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1FaQFn-00081F-Uh for git@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 01 May 2006 06:43:23 +0200 Received: from 193.0.122.19 ([193.0.122.19]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 01 May 2006 06:43:23 +0200 Received: from jnareb by 193.0.122.19 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 01 May 2006 06:43:23 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: git@vger.kernel.org X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.0.122.19 User-Agent: KNode/0.7.7 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Take a look at complexity of that explanation. And the need for additional commit. That balanced against all the headaches of having connectivity header other than "parent". Perhaps it would be better (and easier) just to say note prior parent^1 or note prior repeating found in parent. Just a thought. -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland