From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Narebski Subject: Re: [RFC] send-pack: allow skipping delta when sending pack Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 11:24:42 +0200 Organization: At home Message-ID: References: <20060521054827.GA18530@coredump.intra.peff.net> <7vy7wvx5o9.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20060521081435.GA4526@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20060521084403.GB12825@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun May 21 11:25:54 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FhkC8-0005p8-2a for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 21 May 2006 11:25:52 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751505AbWEUJYj (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 May 2006 05:24:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751506AbWEUJYj (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 May 2006 05:24:39 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:20115 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751505AbWEUJYj (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 May 2006 05:24:39 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1FhkAo-0005di-38 for git@vger.kernel.org; Sun, 21 May 2006 11:24:30 +0200 Received: from 193.0.122.19 ([193.0.122.19]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 21 May 2006 11:24:30 +0200 Received: from jnareb by 193.0.122.19 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 21 May 2006 11:24:30 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: git@vger.kernel.org X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.0.122.19 User-Agent: KNode/0.7.7 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King wrote: > On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 10:24:37AM +0200, Jakub Narebski wrote: > >> Hmmm... isn't the patch slightly against git coding style? > > Oops, yes (though the point is moot since the patch is conceptually > wrong). Is there a git coding style document somewhere? Not that I know of. It's better to follow the coding style used in the rest of files. Besides, differentiating between if (condition) and function(argument); makes IMVHO sense. -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland