From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Narebski Subject: Re: [PATCH] cvsimport: introduce -L option to workaround memory leaks Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 07:29:49 +0200 Organization: At home Message-ID: References: <11482978883713-git-send-email-martin@catalyst.net.nz> <46a038f90605251742p2435ae23k8bfbb98409a30c1c@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri May 26 07:30:16 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FjUts-0007S2-Hq for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 26 May 2006 07:30:16 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030454AbWEZFaI (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 May 2006 01:30:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030435AbWEZFaI (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 May 2006 01:30:08 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:46998 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030212AbWEZFaG (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 May 2006 01:30:06 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1FjUtY-0007Pt-CD for git@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 26 May 2006 07:29:56 +0200 Received: from 193.0.122.19 ([193.0.122.19]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 26 May 2006 07:29:56 +0200 Received: from jnareb by 193.0.122.19 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 26 May 2006 07:29:56 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: git@vger.kernel.org X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.0.122.19 User-Agent: KNode/0.7.7 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Linus Torvalds wrote: > 200k commits at 6k commits per hour is about a day and a half (plus the > occasional packing load). Taking that long to import a CVS archive is > horrible. But I guess it _is_ several years of work, and I guess you > really have to do it only once, but still. And how parsecvs (which as far as I remember didn't have incremental mode) compares wrt speed to git-cvsimport? It is supposed to be faster... -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland