From: "Marco Costalba" <mcostalba@gmail.com>
To: "Junio C Hamano" <junkio@cox.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Cloning from sites with 404 overridden
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 13:17:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e5bfff550603200417h71c083f9saebbf1fe6b21076c@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7v8xr5ld38.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On 3/20/06, Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> wrote:
> "Marco Costalba" <mcostalba@gmail.com> writes:
>
> >> This is totally untested, but maybe something like this?
> >
> > It works for me. Just some trailing white space warning when applying.
>
> The change only removes the error message without changing any
> other logic, so if that works for you, I wonder if leaving
> things as they are is a better option than doing anything short
> of implementing an AI that tries to pattern-match the "allegedly
> corrupt file" with "sorry no such page found" in many natural
> languages.
>
> My test patch makes it impossible to track down the real
> breakage when an HTTP-reachable repository _does_ have a corrupt
> object.
>
> So how about doing this instead?
>
> -- >8 --
> + fprintf(stderr,
> +"Some loose object were found to be corrupt, but they might be just\n"
> +"a false '404 Not Found' error message sent with incorrect HTTP\n"
> +"status code. Suggest running git fsck-objects.\n");
> + }
> return rc;
> }
>
I think it's better, read more correct.
Could be a real corrupted file or just a false 404, so better a
warning then an error message and also better a warning then nothing.
Marco
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-20 12:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-19 10:52 Cloning from sites with 404 overridden Marco Costalba
2006-03-19 13:25 ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2006-03-19 14:04 ` Marco Costalba
2006-03-19 19:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-03-19 21:40 ` Marco Costalba
2006-03-19 23:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-03-20 6:31 ` Marco Costalba
2006-03-20 8:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-03-20 12:17 ` Marco Costalba [this message]
2006-03-20 18:29 ` Lukas Sandström
2006-03-20 19:43 ` Petr Baudis
2006-03-20 19:54 ` Nick Hengeveld
2006-03-19 19:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-03-19 21:31 ` Petr Baudis
2006-03-19 21:43 ` Petr Baudis
2006-03-19 21:45 ` Marco Costalba
2006-03-20 4:32 ` Randal L. Schwartz
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-03-22 2:59 linux
2006-03-22 3:12 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-03-22 4:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-22 6:06 ` Marco Costalba
2006-03-22 6:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-03-22 13:36 ` Andreas Ericsson
2006-03-24 17:29 ` Mark Wooding
2006-03-24 17:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-03-24 17:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-24 18:16 ` Morten Welinder
2006-03-24 18:40 ` Andreas Ericsson
2006-03-22 17:22 ` Nick Hengeveld
2006-03-22 18:36 ` Nick Hengeveld
2006-03-22 19:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-03-22 19:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-03-23 18:43 ` Nick Hengeveld
2006-03-23 20:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-03-22 21:24 ` Radoslaw Szkodzinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e5bfff550603200417h71c083f9saebbf1fe6b21076c@mail.gmail.com \
--to=mcostalba@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=junkio@cox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox