From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Marco Costalba" Subject: Re: qgit feature idea: multiple Patch tabs Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 09:57:08 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Aug 10 09:57:17 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GB5Pn-00075c-Q0 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 10 Aug 2006 09:57:16 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161107AbWHJH5L (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2006 03:57:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161119AbWHJH5L (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2006 03:57:11 -0400 Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.183]:16613 "EHLO py-out-1112.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161107AbWHJH5J (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2006 03:57:09 -0400 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id z74so724034pyg for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2006 00:57:09 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=meRQAz9dlIu4a19uyWCjESj29Q/1ePlfE//6c48d42ONu5jgOM1zN/dmSKnZUhLDcSBZbyx+6cWZI/RKuraG8d56c+GQuazU6vk6y9NSOFhEJjNOeJm/Kq1hzVQUpU/BG4HV5K6oqqtoKGLtzAeB/a39dl55EwhX8wsZDEodM5k= Received: by 10.35.100.6 with SMTP id c6mr3359242pym; Thu, 10 Aug 2006 00:57:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.52.17 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Aug 2006 00:57:08 -0700 (PDT) To: "Jakub Narebski" In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 8/8/06, Jakub Narebski wrote: > It would be nice to be able to have multiple "Patch" tabs, > e.g. by using "Open in new tab"/Ctrl-Click, instead of default > being only one Patch tab, and new patch replacing the old. > I'm coming back after my holidays, and I'm trying to catch up with the list....it will take some time. It seems I'm the only one to go for holiday in this period ;-) A couple of weeks ago I pushed a patch to support multiple "File" tabs. Could your suggestion of multi "patch" tabs follow the same implementation line? Or do you think we could do soemthing better with multi "Patch" tabs (and back port to multi "File" tabs patch)? Thanks Marco